Common ground and supply voltages

  • Thread starter Thread starter Funky Oordvork
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ground Supply
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the concept of common grounding two separate power supplies, specifically capacitors, and the implications for voltage potentials. The original poster is confused about how connecting the bottom plates of the capacitors affects their voltages, believing it alters the voltage across them. Responses clarify that while the bottom plates may equalize in potential, this does not change the voltage difference across each capacitor, as there is no closed circuit to allow current flow. The voltage across each capacitor remains independent, and the potential changes only affect the reference points for measurement. Ultimately, the key takeaway is that grounding does not alter the voltage across the capacitors in this configuration.
Funky Oordvork
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have already asked this question at electronics.stackexchange but I still don't get it. I thought I understood it in terms of a water analogy but when I went back to electrons it still didn't make sense to me. My first reaction when encountering the idea of common grounding 2 separate power supplies was that it would alter the voltages of the supplies, but that doesn't seem to happen. So I thought of the simplest example I could (using capacitors instead of batteries etc.). Here are two capacitors acting as power supplies in circuits with very high resistance loads, one at twice the voltage of the other and with twice as much charge on its plates :

http://i.imgur.com/46rPk.png

if I common ground them :

http://i.imgur.com/RGWKK.png

I realize that this does not create an additional closed circuit. However the bottom plates were at different potentials yet they must now be at the same potential. That means the potential of one has increased and the potential of the other has decreased. Meanwhile the potentials of the top plates are unchanged so to my mind the voltages across both capacitors must have changed. Could someone please explain where I am going wrong in terms of potentials and / or electrons, before and after.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Funky Oordvork said:
I realize that this does not create an additional closed circuit. However the bottom plates were at different potentials yet they must now be at the same potential. That means the potential of one has increased and the potential of the other has decreased.
Potential with respect to what? Where are you connecting the leads of your voltmeter?

Funky Oordvork said:
Meanwhile the potentials of the top plates are unchanged so to my mind the voltages across both capacitors must have changed. Could someone please explain where I am going wrong in terms of potentials and / or electrons, before and after.
Again, the top plates are unchanged with respect to what point? Where are your voltmeter leads connected?
 
The bottom plates may or may not be at different voltages before connection, the voltage difference is undefined. However that does not matter. In this circuit connecting the bottom ends has no effect on each circuit's energy. The right hand still has the same voltage diff across the capacitor, the left is equally unaffected. There is no closed circuit to carry current or provide a voltage reference, so each cct can be analysed completely independently even after connecting the bottom ends.

Assume the original voltage across the right capacitor is 2v and the left is 1v. The potentials at the tops on each side are changed as the charge on the capacitor sets the right hand top as two volts above the bottom, and the left hand top as one volt above the bottom, so the difference of the tops is now defined as 1v.
 
Last edited:
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top