Questions about conservation of momentum

AI Thread Summary
In a closed system with no external forces, momentum is conserved during collisions, meaning the total momentum before and after the collision remains constant. If one object accelerates while another moves at a constant speed, an external force is present, which affects momentum conservation. During a collision, forces act on the objects, but according to Newton's third law, the total change in momentum is zero. The momentum conservation equation m1u1 + m2u2 = m1v1 + m2v2 applies only when no external forces are acting. Thus, understanding the conditions of external forces is crucial for analyzing momentum in collisions.
sgstudent
Messages
726
Reaction score
3
What does having no external force on a closed system mean? For example if I have 2 objects colliding. One travels at a constant speed while the other travels with a constant acceleration. In this case is an external force being applied on the system?

If so, only the m1u1+m2u2=m1v1+m2v2 can be used if the two objects have a constant velocity?

Also, during the collision won't there be a force being applied on the object? So how would momentum be conserved? During the collision the formula F=change in mv/time is used. So is the conservation only after this collision?

Thanks for the help :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An object can't accelerate without some applied force. Momentum isn't conserved if you have an external force on the system. Actually, the change in total momentum is equal to the external force.
 
Khashishi said:
An object can't accelerate without some applied force. Momentum isn't conserved if you have an external force on the system. Actually, the change in total momentum is equal to the external force.

Oh, you mean the change in momentum is equal to the external force multiplied by the duration of it?

So if there is an external force, how will the collision be like? Or are we unable to solve for the final velocities.

Thanks :)
 
sgstudent said:
What does having no external force on a closed system mean? For example if I have 2 objects colliding. One travels at a constant speed while the other travels with a constant acceleration. In this case is an external force being applied on the system?

If so, only the m1u1+m2u2=m1v1+m2v2 can be used if the two objects have a constant velocity?

Also, during the collision won't there be a force being applied on the object? So how would momentum be conserved? During the collision the formula F=change in mv/time is used. So is the conservation only after this collision?

Thanks for the help :smile:

If the only interactions that you are considering are collisions, then "no external force" means that all objects travel at constant velocity between collisions.

During the collision, you're certainly right that there are forces involved. But Newton's third law implies that the total change in momentum due to a collision is zero. So the vectorial sum of the momenta of all the objects is the same before and after the collision. (Assuming once again that the only interaction is collisions).
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Conservation of Momentum for system of particles
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
B Conservation of momentum and conservation of energy details
Replies
30
Views
3K
I Conservation of angular momentum during collisions
Replies
3
Views
3K
I Conservation of Momentum versus Conservation of Velocity
Replies
6
Views
2K
I How do we analyze collisions involving accelerating objects?
Replies
4
Views
2K
B Why is KE not conserved when momentum is?
2
Replies
53
Views
4K
I Conservation of Angular Momentum vs a gyro at the North Pole
Replies
16
Views
1K
I When are the initial and final momentums the same (conserved)?
Replies
16
Views
2K
B Conservation of momentum in a closed system
Replies
3
Views
2K
B K Energy & Momentum: Driving Force or Lost Heat?
Replies
12
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top