Optics | Electromagnetic Waves | Electric/Magnetic Fields

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the flux density of an isotropic quasimonochromatic point source radiating at 100 W, resulting in a flux density of 78.54 W/m² at a distance of 1 m. The relationship between the time-averaged Poynting vector and the amplitudes of the electric (E₀) and magnetic (B₀) fields is clarified, emphasizing that E₀ and B₀ are related by the equation E₀ = c * B₀, where c is the speed of light. The units for flux density are confirmed as W/m², and the inverse square law is discussed regarding the perceived brightness of isotropic sources.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic wave properties
  • Familiarity with the Poynting vector concept
  • Knowledge of the relationship between electric and magnetic fields in EM waves
  • Basic skills in algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the Poynting vector in electromagnetic theory
  • Learn about the relationship between electric and magnetic field amplitudes in electromagnetic waves
  • Explore the inverse square law and its implications for light intensity and distance
  • Review the properties of isotropic point sources in optics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on optics and electromagnetic theory, as well as anyone involved in the study of wave phenomena and their applications.

heycoa
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An isotropic quasimonochromatic point source radiates at a rate of 100 W. What is the flux density at a distance of 1 m? What are the amplitudes of the E- and B- fields at that point?


Homework Equations


I think (but not at all sure) that the equation for flux density is power/(4*pi*meters^2)


The Attempt at a Solution


I plugged my info into that equation and came up with 78.54. I don't know the units and I don't know how to do the last part and get the amplitudes of electric and magnetic field. Please help me learn this! I appreciate it very much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The flux density at r = 1m (which you have correctly calculated) is the time averaged Poynting vector at r = 1m. So how is the amplitudes of E and B related to <S> (the time averaged Poynting vector). Also recall that the amplitudes of E and B themselves are related to each other, so you can represent <S> as being either a function of E^2 or B^2.

Also the units for <S> are just W/m^2 if you used watts and meters.
 
Yes, your equation for flux density is correct. It is actually very intuitive. The equation is saying that all of the energy emitted by the light source (each second) is spread out evenly over a sphere of radius 1 m. Therefore, the amount of power arriving per unit area at you (the observer) 1 metre away is just the total power divided by the surface area of this sphere. This is the flux density. The higher the flux of a source, the more light energy arriving in a given area, and the brighter the source will appear. If you go farther away, the sphere becomes larger, meaning that the same amount of energy is spread out over a much larger area, and the amount that you get is less. This is why isotropic sources appear fainter, their brightness diminishing with the inverse square of the distance.

You don't know the units?

You divided something in watts by something in metres^2. What do you think the resulting units are?

As for finding the magnitudes of the E and B fields: you almost certainly have something in your book or notes that gives a relation between the power of an EM wave, and the amplitude of its electric and magnetic fields. It may be helpful to look up the Poynting vector on Wikipedia. Particularly the section on plane waves. Although, this isn't a plane wave...
 
dydxforsn said:
The flux density at r = 1m (which you have correctly calculated) is the time averaged Poynting vector at r = 1m. So how is the amplitudes of E and B related to <S> (the time averaged Poynting vector). Also recall that the amplitudes of E and B themselves are related to each other, so you can represent <S> as being either a function of E^2 or B^2.

Also the units for <S> are just W/m^2 if you used watts and meters.

The equation I am looking at in the book would be the Poynting vector = c*ε0/2 * E02.

So I can solve for the E0, which would give me the amplitude of the electric field and magnetic field because they are equal. Am I correct?
 
heycoa said:
The equation I am looking at in the book would be the Poynting vector = c*ε0/2 * E02.

So I can solve for the E0, which would give me the amplitude of the electric field and magnetic field because they are equal. Am I correct?

Yes you can calculate E0 that way. But NO: E0 and B0 are not equal. They differ by a constant factor.
 
cepheid said:
Yes you can calculate E0 that way. But NO: E0 and B0 are not equal. They differ by a constant factor.

Yeah, youre right. Lol I had just gotten to the point of boxing my answer and I was like, "no, that's not right".

Its E0=c*B0
 
Well thank you both so much! I very much appreciate your responses and your time!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
763