Can I Simplify This Algebraic Expression by Canceling Out the h?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vt33
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Simplify
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around simplifying the algebraic expression -2rh - h^2 + 2r/h. It is clarified that the expression cannot be simplified by canceling out the variable h because it is not present in all terms of the numerator. Instead, the expression can be split into two fractions for further simplification. Additionally, if this expression is part of a difference quotient, taking the limit as h approaches 0 poses a problem unless the numerator also equals zero at that point. Overall, the consensus is that cancellation is not valid in this case.
vt33
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to simplify -2rh-h^2+2r/h

can I simplify this anymore by canceling out the h, or is that not correct. Also, I don't believe I can factor out the h in the numerator because it's not in all 3 on top, is that correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
vt33 said:
I'm trying to simplify -2rh-h^2+2r/h

can I simplify this anymore by canceling out the h, or is that not correct. Also, I don't believe I can factor out the h in the numerator because it's not in all 3 on top, is that correct?

Yes,it cannot be factored,since it's missing from one of the terms of the sum.
However,it can be split into 2 fractions and "symplified"...

Daniel.
 
Assuming you mean \frac{-2rh- h^2+ 2r}{h}, then, yes, you cannot simplify by cancelling. If this is a difference quotient and you want to take a limit as h goes to 0 then you have a problem! That limit will only exist if the numerator is also 0 when h= 0.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top