How can I find the angle of a curve in a shape with a given length and radius?

  • Thread starter Thread starter uperkurk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Curve
AI Thread Summary
To find the angle of a curve in a shape with a given length and radius, it is essential to understand the relationship between the curve's geometry and the circle's properties. The angle can be determined by using the cosine law, which involves the radius of the circle and the length of the line segment connecting two points on the curve. Specifically, the angle formed by the radius and the line segment can be calculated with the formula θ = arccos((2r² - ab²) / (2r²)), where r is the radius and ab is the length of the segment. Additionally, to find the angle between the segment and the tangent to the curve, 90 degrees must be added to this angle. The calculations are more complex than initially anticipated, requiring a solid understanding of trigonometry.
uperkurk
Messages
167
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, I've been googling how to find the angle of a curve but the results are not the kind I'm looking for.

Let's say I have a shape that has a curve in it at some point. Something like this.

w97xc0V.png


I'm curious what I need to be reading in order to find the angle of the curve. what information do I need to know about the top part in order to find the angle at which the line curves?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
First you will have to tell us what you mean by "angle of a curve". In this picture, does the circle meet the triangle "smoothly"?
 
I've labled the shape a bit better.

L8yFNfP.png


I want to measure the angle of a and b and then I want to find out the degree at which the line curves.

Is is a smooth 70 degree curve? Maybe a smooth 60 degree curve?

This is basically what I'm asking myself. Sorry I'm not being that clear, I'm not even sure if what I'm asking can be solved. I'm just playing with what I'm learned so far.
 
No, this is not going to have any simple answer like '60' or '70'. The angles will depend both on the length of ab and the radius of the circle.

I am going to assume ab is less than the diameter of the circle. In particular, drawing lines from a and b to the center of the circle, call it O, gives a triangle with two sides of length Oa= Ob= r, the radius of the circle and one side of length ab. If we call the angle Oa and Ob make, then, by the cosine law, ab^2= 2r^2- 2r^2cos(\theta)= 2r^2(1- cos(\theta)). From that, cos(\theta)= (2r^2- ab^2)/2r^2 so that the angle between Oa and ab is \theta= arccos(2r^2- ab^2)/2r^2. Since the angle between a tangent to a circle and a radius is 90 degrees, to find the angle between ab and the tangent, add 90 degrees to that:
arccos(2r^2- ab^2)/2r^2)+ 90 degrees.
 
HallsofIvy said:
No, this is not going to have any simple answer like '60' or '70'. The angles will depend both on the length of ab and the radius of the circle.

I am going to assume ab is less than the diameter of the circle. In particular, drawing lines from a and b to the center of the circle, call it O, gives a triangle with two sides of length Oa= Ob= r, the radius of the circle and one side of length ab. If we call the angle Oa and Ob make, then, by the cosine law, ab^2= 2r^2- 2r^2cos(\theta)= 2r^2(1- cos(\theta)). From that, cos(\theta)= (2r^2- ab^2)/2r^2 so that the angle between Oa and ab is \theta= arccos(2r^2- ab^2)/2r^2. Since the angle between a tangent to a circle and a radius is 90 degrees, to find the angle between ab and the tangent, add 90 degrees to that:
arccos(2r^2- ab^2)/2r^2)+ 90 degrees.


Thanks so much. Quite a bit more work than I thought but thanks for making the effort to help :)
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top