Potential energy of pendulum in terms of displacement.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the potential energy of a 1D pendulum in terms of displacement. The original poster expresses frustration over their solution compared to a professor's "clean" answer, later realizing that a Taylor approximation was used. Clarification is provided that a 1D pendulum refers to oscillation in one direction, which can represent a 3D pendulum constrained to a single axis. The poster also corrects their terminology, indicating they are pursuing a physics degree rather than a "physics license." The conversation emphasizes the use of Taylor approximation for small angle approximations in pendulum physics.
Nuclearturtle
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, I'm having troubles finding how to write the potential energy of a 1D pendulum down. In terms of displacement however. This should be easy and it is, but my professor had this nice "clean" solution whereas mine is really dreadfull, any help? :)

edit: Ok nvm guys. I was thinking I went crazy for not finding it, since I almost have my physics license. But my professor used a Taylor approximation, nothing to worry about.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
By the way this is not homework, just a serious question to try to solve coupled harmonic oscillators :(
 
hi, turtle :) welcome to physicsforums

Do you still have a question about pendulums? I agree Taylor approximation is the way to go. (That's why they say 'for small angles'). Also, do you mean 2D pendulum. And what's a physics license?!
 
I meant a 1D pendulum in the sense that it only oscilates in one (!) direction. Of course this could represent a real 3D pendulum oscillating along just one axis.

Concerning the physics license, I didn't know how to sai it right, I meant physics degree or something like that. Let's just say I'm studying physics! This being the reason why I was so concerned not finding this "easy" solution :)

Thx for offering help anyway!
 

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Work-Energy Theorem for Moving Block and Spring System?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Spring-mass system with a pendulum using Lagrangian dynamics
Replies
15
Views
3K
Lagrangian of a double pendulum, finding kinetic energy
Replies
3
Views
3K
Pendulum Conservation of Energy
Replies
31
Views
4K
Help finding the change in potential energy in this problem
Replies
9
Views
771
Spring constant, pendulums and and angular momentum all rolled into one
Replies
1
Views
3K
Pendulum velocity using energy forumula
Replies
4
Views
1K
Finding the quantum number using Morse Potential
Replies
14
Views
3K
What is meant by small oscillations for this potential energy function?
Replies
2
Views
803
Angle that makes kinetic and potential energy of simple pendulum equal
Replies
2
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top