Does formula exist for this sum?

  • Thread starter Thread starter db453r
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Sum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the sum ∑_{i=1}^{n}[i/2^i], with participants exploring its formula. A correction was made regarding a similar sum, leading to clarification that the original sum is indeed ∑_{i=1}^{n} [i/2^i]. A user suggested using Wolfram Alpha, which provided a formula for the sum as 2^{-n}(-n + 2^{n+1} - 2). Additionally, a method involving an auxiliary function and differentiation was shared to derive the sum. The conversation highlights the usefulness of computational tools and mathematical techniques in solving complex series.
db453r
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
\sum_{i=1}^{n}[i/2^i]

Have looked and looked and cannot find it anywhere.

EDITED: To correct mistake.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
db453r said:
\sum_{i=1}^{n}[n/2^n]
That one's easy. There's nothing inside the sum that depends on i, so your sum is the same as ##\frac n {2^n}\sum_{i=1}^n 1##.

Do you mean ##\sum_{i=1}^n \frac i {2^i}## ?

Have looked and looked and cannot find it anywhere.
Have you tried Wolfram alpha, www.wolframalpha.com ?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Oops. Yeah, that's what I meant.
 
Wow. Didn't know Wolfram could do that. Thanks.

Here's what it gave me:

\sum_{i=0}^{n} i/2^{-i} = 2^{-n}(-n+2^{n+1} -2)
 
You can solve this by hand by using a neat trick.
Form the auxiliary function (*):
F(x)=\sum_{i=1}^{i=n}(\frac{x}{2})^{i}, that is, F(x) is readily seen to be related to a geometric sum, with alternate expression (**):
F(x)=\frac{1-(\frac{x}{2})^{n+1}}{1-\frac{x}{2}}-1
Now, the neat trick consists of differentiating (*), and we get:
F'(x)=\sum_{i=1}^{i=n}i*x^{i-1}2^{-i}
that is, we have:
F'(1)=\sum_{i=1}^{i=n}i*2^{-i}
which is your original sum!

Thus, you may calculate that sum by differentiating (**) instead, and evaluate the expression you get at x=1
:smile:
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top