How to find angle of a curve in xy coordinate plane?

AI Thread Summary
The angle of a curve in the xy-coordinate plane can be found using the arctangent of the derivative of the curve, which represents the slope of the tangent line. For projectile motion, the vertical position is described by the equation y = initialheight + VyT - 0.5(9.8)T^2, with its derivative providing the vertical speed. A sample calculation showed discrepancies in the expected angle when using the derivative at t=0, indicating a misunderstanding of the initial velocity components. The correct initial vertical and horizontal speeds are derived from the angle of launch, with the vertical speed calculated as Vy=4 sin(30) and horizontal as Vx=4 cos(30). The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying trigonometric functions to determine the angle of the curve accurately.
Matt Jacques
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I think it is atan of the derivative of the curve, is that right?

Thanks

Matt
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The derivative is the slope of the tangent line. The atan is thus the angle of the tangent line with the x axis.
 
Thanks for the quick reply. Yeah, that is what I thought. However, I have a followup question.

For the vertical position of a projectile the formula is:

y = initialheight + VyT - .5(9.8)T^2

The derivative of that is

d/dx = Vy - 9.8T

I did a sample problem, Vi=4, angle = 30º, initial height = 1.2

Total Time: .739 seconds
Height of Max time: .202 seconds
Distance: 2.56 m

if I take atan( Vy - 9.8T) when t = 0 the angle comes up as 63º, not 30º which it should be.

Hmm?
 
Last edited:
I started to work out the problem, but you didn't state it quite clearly...

Do you mean V0x is the initial Vi in the direction of vector i ?
 
Last edited:
dy/dx is the arctan of the angle the curve makes with the horizontal.

dy/dt has no geometric meaning (in an xy-coordinate system).

If Vi= 4 is the initial speed and the projectile is fired at a 30 degree angle to the horizontal, then the initial vertical speed is Vy= 4 cos(30)= 4(1/2)= 2 and the initial horizontal speed is
Vx= 4 sin(30)= 4([sqrt](3)/2)= 2 [sqrt](3).

The vertical speed would be given by dy/dt= 2- 9.8t and the horizontal speed (assuming gravity is the only force) by
dx/dt= 2[sqrt]3. At t= 0, dy/dt= 2 and dx/dt= 2[sqrt](3).
By the chain rule, dy/dx= (dy/dt)/(dx/dt)= 2/2[sqrt](3)= 1/[sqrt](3)= [sqrt](3)/3, the tangent of 30 degrees.
 
Thanks, Hallsofivy. You created a good thorough reply. However, I think you accidentally swapped cosine and sine in Vx and Vy.

Anyway, for the benifit of searches, here is the formula for the angle:

http://homepage.mac.com/jjacques2/angle.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top