Can erf(x) be used to solve e^(x^2)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter newton1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrate
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the integral of e^(x^2) can be expressed in terms of elementary functions. While e^(x^2) is a continuous function and has an anti-derivative, it is not an elementary function. The anti-derivative of e^(x^2) cannot be expressed using standard functions like polynomials or exponentials. The Error Function, erf(x), is mentioned as an anti-derivative for e^(-x^2), but it does not directly apply to e^(x^2). Thus, while e^(x^2) has an integral, it does not have a simple expression in terms of elementary functions.
newton1
Messages
151
Reaction score
0
does the integrate e^(x^2) can solve??
i think is no...
but why??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That depends upon exactly what you mean.

Since e^(x^2) is a continuous function, yes, it HAS an integral (anti-derivative). Every continuous function (and many non-continuous functions) is the derivative of some function and therefore has an anti-derivative.

Is that anti-derivative any "elementary function" (defined as polynomials, rational functions, exponentials, logarithms, trig functions and combinations of them)? No, if fact for most functions the anti-derivative is not an elementary function. (There are more functions in heaven and Earth than are dreamed of in your philosophy, Horatio!)

Of course one can always DEFINE a new function to do the job. I don't know specifically about e^(x^2) but the ERROR FUNCTION, Erf(x) is defined as an anti-derivative of e^(-x^2).
 
eh...

may i ask what is Error Function??
 

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Thread 'Non-orthogonal bases'

Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
View full post »
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'

Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'

I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Calculating the inverse of a function involving the error function
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Why does the integral of sine of x^2 from - infinity to + infinity diverge?
Replies
4
Views
2K
B Is it possible to find the integral of ##f(x)/x^2##?
Replies
8
Views
2K
A Memory issues in numerical integration of oscillatory function
Replies
3
Views
1K
I Why fixed point iteration of ##x^3 = 1-x^2## doesn't converge when ##x_0= 0##
Replies
16
Views
518
I Solving Stat Mech Integral with Wolfram Alpha
Replies
2
Views
2K
MHB How can I solve the problem of $e^x-\ln{x}=4$ without a calculator?
Replies
10
Views
1K
MHB Solve $2+5\ln{x}=21$: Find $x$
Replies
5
Views
1K
MHB What is the inverse function of erf?
Replies
7
Views
4K
B Can We Simplify the Taylor Series Expansion for e^(f(x,y))?
Replies
3
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top