- #1
Treadstone 71
- 275
- 0
Is chess a futile game?
arildno said:Nope, the answer is, in fact, 42.
The question you ask is a good one. I have spent quite a bit of time thinking about it, and well got almost nowhere. I believe that the fact that white goes first does give white some advantage. Statistically speaking I think white wins slightly more often. So I believe that if white plays "perfectly" then black is bound to lose. I ofcourse have no proof of this, this is just an opinion. I think the only way to check that I'm right or wrong is by going through all possbile combinations, where white plays the "best" move and seeing what happens to differnt responses from black. Of course finding the "best" move isn't easy, so a few different combinations will have to be tried each time. However, This will WAY to long even for the fastest computers.Treadstone 71 said:Is chess a futile game?
Treadstone 71 said:Futile game = game that always results in a draw if all players play properly. Kinda like tic-tac-toe. I was wondering if chess was the same.
:rofl: I knew it.
Useful nucleus said:The modern players of chess always think of their rating and afraid of loss, so a lot of games nowadays end with draw by agreement. But in the past, until 1950's, The players were more enthusiatic and they played to win only and draw by agreement was so rare.
The fact that white plays first give them a slight initiative. This is recognized by the chess players as an advantage, and reading the analysis of Grand Masters (GM) about a game, you'll encounter at some point in the game, probably around the 12th move or so, the commetary "Black has equalized", meaning the slight advantage of white has disapeared. However, even if black never quite equalizes, it is believed by GMs that this slight advantage of white is insufficient to win.Tzar said:I believe that the fact that white goes first does give white some advantage. Statistically speaking I think white wins slightly more often. So I believe that if white plays "perfectly" then black is bound to lose.
quasar987 said:Draws by agreement were indeed more rare, but they were quite common amongst the players of the soviet union. In fact, young Bobby Fisher once threw a tantrum about it and left the qualification cycle for the place of challenger to the world champion (Botvinik at that time), accusing the ruskies of cheating.
vaishakh said:I have something to say here. An indian book for undergrad physics starts with such an explanation. The name of the book is concepts of physics by H C Verma. I will try to say a bit of what he mean.
He starts the book with the explanation of basic idea of physics. He says that the scientist's mind is like a good chess player. He tries to make more and more perfect guesses seeing or observing the surounding. But how much perfect is it depends on how much experienced he is. When we once start seeing chess games played between two players without knowing the rules, after a lot of games we slowly understand mmany rules by guessing at instants and then neglecting the once which are wrong when we see the opposite thing happenning. And thus soon we start getting more and more accustomed with the rules. So a perfect move in chess is very difficult to guess.
Chess is a deterministic, turn-based game of complete information. Thus, it can (in principle) be completely analyzed with game theory, and it could be classified into one of three cases:My opinion is that chess is not a futile game because a "perfect" game cannot be played. As someone posted above, there is no perfect move
8x8.Chess is on a 10x10 board with the moves designed so that there is a possible counter. So technically, if both players play their best and are able to counter each other's moves, then yes it will end in a draw.
Hurkyl said:The only problem is that we don't yet have enough theoretical and computational power to figure out which case is correct.
Hurkyl said:8x8.
If you have a proof that perfectly played chess will end in a draw, then please share. Otherwise, let me refer you to my previous post. :grumpy:
kahless2005 said:I was saying that theoretically, if the two players knew every single move and counter to the moves, then it would end in a draw
Right, let's play a game. Like noughts and crosses. I get to go first and place two symbols, you get to go second and play one symbol at a time. Three in a line wins. Every possibly move is knowable, and analysable. By your reasoning it will always end in a draw, so let's play for $1,000 per game.kahless2005 said:I was saying that theoretically, if the two players knew every single move and counter to the moves, then it would end in a draw
Yes you can. Given enough computing power, it is theoretically possible to determine if the opening position is "white to mate", "black to mate", or "drawn".Sidharth - you cannot directly start from a position and say that from here there can be forced mate for one of the colours or there is a trivial draw. Forced sacrifices or or draws can be predicted once a stage of chess called opening is over.
No, chess is not a game of luck. It requires a high level of skill, strategy, and critical thinking to be successful. Luck may play a small role in some situations, but overall, chess is a game of skill.
No, chess is not a waste of time. It has been proven to have numerous benefits such as improving cognitive abilities, memory, and problem-solving skills. It also provides a great source of entertainment and a way to connect with others.
While anyone can learn and become proficient at chess, becoming a master requires a significant amount of dedication, practice, and natural ability. It is not an easy feat, but with determination and hard work, it is possible.
No, chess is not only for highly intelligent people. While intelligence can certainly be beneficial in playing chess, it is not a requirement. Anyone can learn and improve their skills through practice and dedication.
Yes, chess can have real-world applications. The skills and strategies learned in chess can be applied to various aspects of life, such as decision making, problem-solving, and critical thinking. It can also be used as a tool for teaching and learning in educational settings.