Neutron star: heaviest teaspoon of matter

AI Thread Summary
Neutron stars are incredibly dense, with a density of approximately 6.65 x 10^14 g/cm^3, making them among the densest objects in the universe. They are supported against gravitational collapse by neutron degeneracy pressure rather than fusion. While black holes theoretically have infinite density, they lack a comprehensive theory to describe their singularities. Speculative theories about quark stars exist, but there is no observational evidence to support them. The discussion highlights the extreme conditions of neutron stars, including their immense gravitational potential energy compared to nuclear fusion.
Vincent Vega
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Is there anything in the observable universe that weighs more? 1 teaspoon = billion tons
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
hey Vega,

the matter in a neutron star is very (very very very) dense as you've grasped. Current theory explains neutron stars something like a giant nucleus, one that has a radius of about 10 km. (Actually the density of a neutron star is roughly 6.65 * 10^14 g/cm^3 while that in a typical nuclues is 'only' 2.3 * 10^14 g/cm^3). The star is being supported against gravitational collapse not by internal fusion like normal stars but by neutron degeneracy pressure. In plain english neutrons are a type of particle called fermions which don't like to be in the same place as other fermions so they exert a pressure if you bring them close together.

I don't think there are many things that could be denser because the nuetrons in the star are in the most closely packed configuration they can be in. I believe there are some speculative theories of quark stars where the individual neutrons dissolve into a sea of quarks, but there is no observational evidence that I am aware of. Also you have black holes which theoretically have infinite densities, but there is no theory that works well when trying to describe the singularity of a black hole.

Here are some other extreme facts about neutron stars

an object dropped from a height of 1m above the surface of a typical neutron star would impact the surface traveling at 4.3 million mph. that's one hell of a ride.

im kind of rambling here because its late, but another interesting thing is that the gravitational potential energy liberated when an object falls onto a neutron star is greater than the amount of energy one would liberate through the fusion of hydrogen atoms. ie throwing a chunk of hydrogen onto a nuetron star and collecting the energy that is radiated on the way down is a more efficient way to get energy than nuclear fusion!

hope your mind is warped :-p

gabe
 
Last edited:
It is... my mind that is. That's pretty narly info!
 
Last edited:
What has density than a neutron star? Hmmm, that would be a super massive black hole in a very large galaxy. It should be sucking in millions of stars per second!
 
white holes said:
What has density than a neutron star? Hmmm, that would be a super massive black hole in a very large galaxy. It should be sucking in millions of stars per second!


yeah i would agree you could say the density is higher (infinite), but you overestimated the accretion rate a little there white hole. Say we had a galaxy with 10 trillion stars in it (a large over estimate) then if they were disappearing at the rate of a million per second the whole galaxy would be swallowed in ten million seconds or about 116 days. galaxies last a little longer than that.
 
and black holes don't really suck things in like that. If our sun suddenly turned into a black hole we wouldn't even notice it, other than it would stay nighttime and get really cold. Our orbit would be the exact same.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top