Understanding Relativity from A and B's Point of View

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter EternitysEnd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point Relativity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the relativistic effects experienced by two observers, A and B, where A remains on Earth and B accelerates away from Earth. Participants explore the implications of relativity on time perception and mass from both observers' perspectives, addressing concepts such as time dilation, simultaneity, and the Doppler effect.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how B perceives time on Earth while accelerating away, suggesting that B might see Earth's time as faster, but is unsure.
  • Another participant asserts that B's perspective is consistent with A's, stating there is no paradox upon B's return and emphasizes the change in simultaneity due to acceleration.
  • A participant expresses confusion regarding the apparent contradiction between their reading and a book's claim that time on Earth is later when B returns.
  • One participant explains the Doppler effect and time dilation using a twin scenario, detailing the mathematical relationships involved in B's journey and how B perceives A's time using a telescope.
  • A later reply indicates that the explanation was understood after some effort, suggesting a grasp of the concepts presented.
  • Another participant recommends a book for a more visual and less mathematical approach to understanding these concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the implications of relativity, with some agreeing on the mechanics of time dilation and Doppler effects, while others remain uncertain about specific interpretations and outcomes. No consensus is reached on the perceived time differences from B's perspective.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference mathematical formulations and concepts that may depend on specific definitions and assumptions about relativistic effects. The discussion includes unresolved questions about simultaneity and the interpretation of time as experienced by different observers.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying relativity, particularly beginners seeking to understand the implications of time dilation and the perspectives of different observers in relativistic scenarios.

EternitysEnd
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I've just started studying relativity and I am having some slight problems.

Say there are 2 persons, a and b. A is on Earth and B is accelerating away from earth.

While B gets faster and faster he will gain mass and his time will get slower from A's point of view.
How does this look from B's point of view? I suppose he has normal mass, but how does he see the time relative to earth. Is the time on Earth faster relative to his, and if so, why? (since moving away from Earth is the same as the Earth moving away from you, right?)
And if not, then why is the time on Earth so much later when B turns around and accelerates back to earth?

Hope you understand my question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it looks the same from B's point of view (after the acceleration). No, there's no paradox on B's return. When B turns around (ie. experiences measurable acceleration) he also changes his mind about where (in space, and in time) A is "now" located (simultaneity isn't what you used to think it was).

This is in countless FAQ's somewhere..
 
I couldn't find a FAQ, not sticky on the forum at least. I've read a book about it saying that if B returns the time on Earth is later, but this is not the case?

I just don't understand how it would look if B had a telescope and was looking at the Earth on the way back.
 
A Doppler time-rate change is observed with a telescope. In the end, this agrees with time dilation.

Are you studying a mathematical introduction to relativity? If not, then the following might not make sense.

Two twins, Alfred and Betty, are together on the planet Omicron 7. They synchronize their watches to zero, and Betty then sets off on a return trip from Omicron 7 to Earth and back to Omicron 7. The distance between Omicron 7 and Earth is L lightyears in the (approximately) inertial reference frame of Omicron 7 and the Earth. Betty takes the most direct route and moves at a constant speed v during both the outgoing and incoming segments of the trip. Therefore, the time dilation/Lorentz contraction factor is

\gamma =\left( 1-v^{2}\right) ^{-\frac{1}{2}}>1

and the Doppler shift factor is

k=\sqrt{\frac{1+v}{1-v}}>1.

In Betty's frame the distance between Earth and the other planet is Lorentz contracted to L^{\prime}=L/\gamma. Consequently, the time taken, according to Betty's clock, for the first part of the trip is t_{1}^{\prime}=L^{\prime }/v years. For the same reason, Betty takes another t_{2}^{\prime}=L^{\prime}/v years, according to her watch, to get back to the Earth, for a total elapsed time of t^{\prime}=t_{1}^{\prime}+t_{2}^{\prime}=2L^{\prime}/v years. Alfred measures the total elapsed time to be t=2L/v=\gamma t^{\prime} years.

Alfred and Betty can directly read both watches at the start and end of the trip. As Betty travels, Betty uses a telescope to watch Alfred's wristwatch. As Betty watches Alfred's watch, the frequency of revolution that she sees for Alfred's second hand is related to the frequency of revolution of her own second had by the Doppler effect factor k. During the ougoing leg, Betty sees Alfred's second hand spin slower than hers by a factor of k. Thus, at the turn around point Betty sees, via her telescope, a reading of T_{1}=t_{1}^{\prime}/k years on Alfred's watch. During the incominging leg, Betty sees Alfred's second hand spin fasterer than hers by a factor of k. Thus, Betty sees the reading on Alfreds's watch increase by T_{2}=t_{2}^{\prime}k years during the homecoming leg. The total time that Betty sees elapse on Alfred's watch, T_{1}+T_{2}=t^{\prime}\left( 1/k+k\right) /2=\gamma t^{\prime}=t, agrees with the time dilation calculation above, as it should.
 
Last edited:
Thanks!

Took a few reads but I think I got it now.
 
Try to find a used copy of Paul Hewetts "Conceptual Physics" Little or no math - a good visualizable treatment of these kinds of problems
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
3K