Is energy conserved in this case?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Stereo_Chemist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 3K views
Stereo_Chemist
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I recently had a question presented to me, and I am wondering if I got it right.

The question stated that a figure skater with a moment of inertia was rotating at an angular speed of 4 rad/s. Then the figure skater reduced her moment of inertia by bringing her arms in, and her speed increased to 12 rad/s. How much did her moment of inertia increase by.

For this part I know that angular momentum is conserved, so if the angular speed increased by a factor of 3, her moment of inertia must decrease by a factor of 3 also.

The next question then asked if energy was conserved in this case.

I figured that the only type of energy in this case was rotational energy and there is no translational energy, so you could simply use the formula

R.E. = 1/2Iw^2

So if you plug in the initial moment of inertia and angular speed and then the final one, you will get two different values, so energy is not conserved, correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Correct. Mechanical energy is not conserved. The skater has to do work to pull in her arms; she adds mechanical energy. (Of course total energy is conserved. She transformed chemical energy into mechanical energy.)