'Unbreakable' encryption introduced

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Encryption
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the advancements and implications of quantum cryptography, particularly the recent launch of a computer network utilizing unbreakable quantum encryption. While some participants express optimism about achieving perfect secrecy, others argue that no encryption can be truly unbreakable by definition. Critics highlight that quantum encryption primarily addresses eavesdropping on fiber optics, which may not be a significant issue when modern encryption algorithms like AES are in use. They emphasize that this technology does not adequately protect against vulnerabilities such as man-in-the-middle attacks and suggest that it may be an over-engineered solution to a problem that is fundamentally human rather than technical. The conversation reflects skepticism about the practical benefits of quantum cryptography in enhancing overall security.
Messages
19,788
Reaction score
10,738
I think this is the perfect place to discuss the possibilities of quantum cryptography. It seems to have become a reality now. Let's discuss whether this truly is unbreakable! We've heard it before, but is it different this time?

Perfect secrecy has come a step closer with the launch of the world's first computer network protected by unbreakable quantum encryption at a scientific conference in Vienna.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7661311.stm
 
Last edited:
Technology news on Phys.org
No encryption can be "unbreakable."

This holds by definition.
 
shoehorn said:
No encryption can be "unbreakable."

This holds by definition.

So if someone could break it then that would mean we have to rewrite the science books?
 
shoehorn said:
No encryption can be "unbreakable."

This holds by definition.

One-time pad? Quantum entanglement?
 
It's not encryption it's only secure fibre links - this is not new (although the range might be a record)
It does however solve a problem that isn't the problem - it stops you being able to eavesdrop on a fibre by patching into the fibre.
If you have traffic data encrypted with modern algorithms like AES this isn't a problem.
The main drawback is that you can still eavesdrop everytime it goes through a switch or router - this technique only works for a single unbroken length of single mode fibre between two points.
 
Last edited:
I don't see how this would protect from a "man in the middle" attack either. It seems a lot of effort for little benefit.
 
It doesn't.

It's the classic security thing - a technology solution to a human problem.
eg. the cleaners found someone's password in the trash: solution double the number of bits in the encryption.
 
Back
Top