What is the minimum wind speed needed to get 'pop' from a Kitewing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phrak
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The Kitewing is a handheld sail designed for use on ice, water, or land, with a symmetric design and a surface area of 5.5 square meters. Achieving lift requires a minimum wind speed, which is difficult to calculate precisely due to the experimental nature of aerodynamics. Initial estimates suggest that a wind speed of around 15 mph may be necessary to achieve a relative wind speed of 30 mph for optimal performance. The coefficient of lift (CL) is crucial for accurate calculations, but it varies and is not constant, leading to potential errors in estimations. Understanding the aerodynamic principles and conducting experiments are essential for more precise performance predictions.
Phrak
Messages
4,266
Reaction score
7
There's a product on the market called a Kitewing. It's a hand held sail for ice, water or land. It can be swung horizontally to lift. I'm curious to know how much mimium wind speed would be needed to get some pop?

There are some utube videos out where some get 5 ft of air from level ground. Suprizing for such a small wing.

The sail is symmetric like a wing, having a 5.5 square meters, with an aspect ration of about 2.2, and a roughly eliptical profile. Wing span and washout aren't given.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So I guess there aren't any AEs around who have any interest in fluid flows without a cabin wraped around them and 500+ horses in the front...
 
Your question doesn't leand itself to a simple answer. Aerodynamics is highly experimental. There isn't a magic formula you can use to arrive at the answer you want.
 
I've run out of time. I'll have to generate some numbers tomorrow afternoon.
 
Cyrus said:
Your question doesn't leand itself to a simple answer. Aerodynamics is highly experimental. There isn't a magic formula you can use to arrive at the answer you want.

I'm looking for a, not too, rough idea of how well it could perform. So far I have,

Mg = ½CLρV²S

ρO = 1.225 kg/m³, density of air at sea level
ρ = 1.1 kg/m³
CL_MAX=1.2
V = 30 mph = 44 fps = 13.4 m/s
S = 5.5 m²
g = 9.8 m/s², acceleration due to gravity.
M = 67 kg
Mg = 146 lb ...very marginal.

For a sail on land, we could assume a "beta" of at least 30 degrees. This means wind speed is 15 mph to obtain a 30 mph relative wind, V at the most favorable tack. The ground speed would be 30*0.866 mph.

For a wing that is mostly single sided except along the leading edge, I'm assuming a max coefficient of lift of only 1.2.

I still don't know if I'm using the right coefficient of lift. CL_MAX is the lift coefficient of an infinite aspect ration section.
 
Sorry, that's way wrong. You want 'not too close' build or use a wind tunnel, or find data generated by someone who has. You've pretty much assumed 99.9% of the problem. Your answer is probably as much as 40% off.
 
You're estimating on the Cl and treating like an infinite wing. Of course it's going to be off, but, IMO, for a first guess, those numbers don't seem all that bad. At least you aren't in the area of an order of magnitude off. Especially since you are treating Cl as a constant (which it isn't) and who knows just what the relative velocity a wing actually sees is. As a total SWAG I think you're not too bad. Just understand that to be accurate you need way more information.
 
FredGarvin said:
You're estimating on the Cl and treating like an infinite wing. Of course it's going to be off, but, IMO, for a first guess, those numbers don't seem all that bad. At least you aren't in the area of an order of magnitude off. Especially since you are treating Cl as a constant (which it isn't) and who knows just what the relative velocity a wing actually sees is. As a total SWAG I think you're not too bad. Just understand that to be accurate you need way more information.

I don't understand the sources of large amounts of error. Is it just CL? But, this is what I was asking. How is CL max obtained from CL max from section data?
 
Last edited:
Phrak said:
I don't understand the sources of large amounts of error. Is it just CL? But, this is what I was asking. How is CL max obtained from CL max from section data?
It's usually not. It is done experimentally...hence Cy's comments.
 
  • #10
FredGarvin said:
It's usually not. It is done experimentally...hence Cy's comments.

I'll read theory of wing sections.
 

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top