Medical Water content of the human body

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the varying water content in the human body based on weight and sex, with typical percentages cited as 62% for men and 51% for women. It highlights that water percentage decreases with rising BMI, but questions the validity of specific figures suggesting that gaining weight does not significantly increase body water. The conversation references historical measurements of water content in different tissues, noting that lean muscle contains about 75% water while body fat contains only 10%. Additionally, it points out that the relationship between adipose tissue and blood supply complicates the understanding of body water dynamics. Overall, the consensus is that while BMI may not accurately reflect body fat composition, increased adipose tissue has a minimal effect on total body water.
CRGreathouse
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
2,832
Reaction score
0
I was wondering how the total amount of water in a typical human varies by weight and sex.

I saw a site claiming that the typical male/female water percentages by mass were 62% for men and 51% for women; fair enough, though I've seen higher figures. (I'm more concerned with the ratio between the two than the absolute level, in both cases.)

It also says (understandably) that the water percentage decreases as BMI rises. The particular figures it gives, though, are hard for me to swallow. Consider a range of people with identical height (or a single person gaining or losing weight), so that their weights are proportional to their BMI. At the obesity threshold, the water weight would be 30 * 48% = 14.4 units; at the morbidly obese theshold, the water weight would be 40 * 36% = 14.4 units. That would suggest that gaining weight (at least past a certain point) does not increase the amount of water in the body, which seems questionable to me.

Does anyone have better figures? Or know of a database that records appropriate information to determine the answer?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
My gut feeling would be the lower the BMI the lower the water percentage, as water resides mainly in soft tissues (is that an English term? Thats how these things are called in Polish).
 
You are asking a good question- the water content of various tissues has been measured (simply weighing and drying) way back in the 1930's.. I have a moldy book around here somewhere with the data... I did find this on wiki which is close to what I recall:

"Regarding specific tissues: Lean muscle tissue contains about 75% water by weight. Blood contains almost 70% water, body fat contains 10% water and bone has 22% water. Skin also contains much water. The human body is about 60% water in adult males and 55% in adult females."

Aside from whether or not the BMI is an accurate index of body fat composition, it's clear that increasing the amount of adipose tissue has a very small effect on body water.

But it may not be as simple as that- adipose tissue requires a blood supply as well. IIRC, losing a pound of weight corresponds to 75% fat and 25% blood/support tissue, but I can't find a reference that supports that. This abstract

http://jap.physiology.org/cgi/pdf_extract/23/5/621

points out that the ratio of adipose tissue to blood supply is not constant, and for obese subjects, the relative amount of blood supply is very small.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Andy Resnick said:
body fat contains 10% water

Surprise

Now I feel like if my BWI (Brain Water Index) was above average.
 
Andy Resnick said:
You are asking a good question- the water content of various tissues has been measured (simply weighing and drying) way back in the 1930's.. I have a moldy book around here somewhere with the data... I did find this on wiki which is close to what I recall:

"Regarding specific tissues: Lean muscle tissue contains about 75% water by weight. Blood contains almost 70% water, body fat contains 10% water and bone has 22% water. Skin also contains much water. The human body is about 60% water in adult males and 55% in adult females."

Aside from whether or not the BMI is an accurate index of body fat composition, it's clear that increasing the amount of adipose tissue has a very small effect on body water.

But it may not be as simple as that- adipose tissue requires a blood supply as well. IIRC, losing a pound of weight corresponds to 75% fat and 25% blood/support tissue, but I can't find a reference that supports that. This abstract

http://jap.physiology.org/cgi/pdf_extract/23/5/621

points out that the ratio of adipose tissue to blood supply is not constant, and for obese subjects, the relative amount of blood supply is very small.

Great, thanks for the info! That actually makes sense -- much more than the page I was looking at, at least.

So for every additional mass unit of adipose tissue, the total water content should increase by 10% (1*0.1) to 25% (0.75*0.1 + 0.25*0.7) of a unit. A 150-pound male who is 60% water would have to gain 90 to 225 (!) pounds to increase his constituent water by a quarter.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top