Calculating the Commutator of x and p - Problem Discussion

  • Thread starter Thread starter lihurricane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Commutator
lihurricane
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
i have met a problem about the commutator of x and p.
[x,p]=ihbar

/p> is the eigenstate of momentum operator p.

<p/xp-px/p>

=<p/xp/p>-<p/px/p>

=p<p/x/p>-p<p/x/p> the second term is got by the momentum operator p acting on
the left state.

=0

so i get zero! is there anyone can point out where i am wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you calculate <p|x|p>? Which number will you get? I can tell you: any number you want, depending on how you decide to calculate it. You are playing pseudo-math with formal expressions without really understanding their mathematical meaning. That is how many paradoxes appear.

Many theorems in mathematics are valid under certain assumptions. Skip the assumptions, apply the theorem, and you can well create a paradox.
 
lihurricane said:
[...]
so i get zero! is there anyone can point out where i am wrong?

Take a look at Post #18 in this (very recent) thread:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=426509&page=2

More importantly, check out the references I mentioned. :-)
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top