Can locomotive engine fenders be modified to prevent human and animal accidents?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sibitg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engine Locomotive
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential modification of locomotive engine fenders to prevent accidents involving humans and animals on railway tracks. Participants explore various design ideas, implications of such modifications, and the broader context of safety measures related to train operations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests modifying locomotive fenders to push away individuals and animals from the tracks, proposing various design changes such as height adjustments and shape alterations.
  • Another participant argues that a "push away" fender could be fatal due to the locomotive's mass and speed, emphasizing the importance of avoiding accidents altogether.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the idea of a "people pusher," with one stating it might reduce the number of "morons" in the world.
  • A suggestion is made for a softer fender design, as current designs could cause severe injury or death upon impact.
  • Concerns are raised about the validity of the claim that hundreds of people are killed by trains daily, with requests for empirical data rather than anecdotal evidence.
  • One participant shares local observations of train-related accidents, suggesting that the count could be significant but acknowledges the need for data to support this claim.
  • Another participant proposes focusing on education and safety measures in the community rather than relying solely on technological solutions.
  • Discussion includes the effectiveness of existing safety measures, such as fences and designated crossing points, and the role of personal responsibility in preventing accidents.
  • Participants reflect on the purpose of cow catchers, noting their role in preventing derailments but questioning the welfare of animals involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the feasibility and safety implications of modifying locomotive fenders. There is no consensus on the effectiveness of such modifications or the necessity of pursuing them over other safety measures.

Contextual Notes

Some claims about accident statistics are based on personal observations and local news reports, lacking broader empirical support. The discussion highlights the complexity of addressing safety in railway operations, including social and behavioral factors.

sibitg
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi Engineering guys, why you can't think about modifying the locomotive engine fender to push away human beings and animals from track. You know, each day there are hunderds of human beings are getting trapped under the wheels of locomotives. Can you guys think about modifying the fender - reducing its height further, changing its shape, moving it near to wheels or away further from wheels, giving the loco driver a control over the height of the fender etc. Please make it a discussion topic and create a new innovative locomotice engine fender and file patent.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I think the "push away" fender will be fatal at impact due to the locomotive mass and speed. The best way not to get killed is to avoid it.
 
I personally don't like the idea of having a "people pusher" on the front of trains as it ultimately reduces the amount of morons in the world.
 
I'm sure you could design a soft "people pusher" fender. The current cattle guard would kill you on impact, and probably send you flying 30 ft.
 
Topher925 said:
I personally don't like the idea of having a "people pusher" on the front of trains as it ultimately reduces the amount of morons in the world.

I agree..nothing wrong with social Darwinism...
 
sibitg said:
You know, each day there are hunderds of human beings are getting trapped under the wheels of locomotives.

Hundreds daily?
 
sibitg
please note your source on this death count. what government source?
 
In our area, at least 2 days in a week, there will be news like "2 people moved down by tran", "3 people moved down" etc. This count is for only 30km stretch of railway line passes through our area. This news never gets attention, since it is very common. Even news papers summarize the news in two or three lines in local news section. So I GUESS, the count in national or international level could be hundreds, may be I am wrong.

There are two types of victims - 1) accidently get caught in front of the train 2) they want to kill them selves.

Yes, due to the mass and speed of the train the chances of sruvival is less. But atleast if we can push them away from the wheels, that would be great.
 
before I will consider this seriously I need empirical data not anecdotal storys from news papers.
 
  • #10
I can believe the 'statistics' actually. For example, have you seen the slums which line the railways in many Indian cities? I'm not sure an adapted cow catcher is the solution though...
 
  • #11
sibitg said:
In our area, at least 2 days in a week, there will be news like "2 people moved down by tran", "3 people moved down" etc. This count is for only 30km stretch of railway line passes through our area.

I would suggest that your efforts would be better put toward stopping this problem in your area. Education, safety measures, etc.

This is something you could act on now, today, rather than trying to find a technology solution years away that no one else will be convinced is necessary.
 
  • #12
DaveC426913 said:
I would suggest that your efforts would be better put toward stopping this problem in your area. Education, safety measures, etc.

A fence?

All the lines around where I live have big steel fences with spikes surrounding them. If you need to cross there are designated crossing points with signs saying "look both ways". There is a raised section allowing you to cross and preventing tripping on the track itself. All car crossings have lights at the very least. To get hit by a train is very much down to stupidity (even without such safety measures).

I take it the OP understands the purpose of the cow catcher? They certainly don't give the cow a 'gentle shove' to move it out of the way. If anything, in a situation where I end up on the track and can't get out of the way, I wouldn't want the cow catcher installed, I'd rather take my chances by laying as flat as possible hoping it passes over me (extremely optimistic I know).
 
Last edited:
  • #13
jarednjames said:
I take it the OP understands the purpose of the cow catcher? They certainly don't give the cow a 'gentle shove' to move it out of the way.
That is a good point.

The cow-catcher serves a practical purpose in preventing the carcass from getting under the wheels and derailing the train. But I do not know how many cows actually survive the experience - I suspect that function comes in at a very distant second.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K