Rest Frame of a Photon - FAQ by Forum Members

D H
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
15,524
Reaction score
769
I've read that in relativity the concept of the rest frame of a photon doesn't make sense. Why is that?

A rest frame of some object is a reference frame in which the object's velocity is zero. One of the key axioms of special relativity is that light moves at c in all reference frames. The rest frame of a photon would require the photon to be at rest (velocity=0) and moving at c (velocity=299792458 m/s). That of course is contradictory. In other words, the concept doesn't make sense.The following forum members have contributed to this FAQ:
D H
Dale
Fredrik
Pallen
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and Kyle.Nemeth
Physics news on Phys.org
One thing to add to this is a brief comment that while it is not possible to have a reference frame (tetrad) where light is at rest, it is possible to have a non-inertial coordinate system where some light rays have constant coordinates. Light cone coordinates are one such example. This is one place where it is important to understand the subtle distinction between reference frames (tetrads) and coordinate systems.
 
Last edited:

Thread 'Describing the Big Bang'

I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
View full post »
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'

Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'

See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
View full post »

Thread 'A sufficient condition for integrability of equation ##\nabla g=0##'

In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
View full post »

Similar threads

Question about "Rest frame of a photon" FAQ
Replies
19
Views
3K
Restframe of Photon: Explained
Replies
5
Views
2K
B Reciprocal time dilation
Replies
14
Views
1K
B Confusion over relative velocities and reference frames
Replies
5
Views
2K
I About inertial reference frames and logical deduction
Replies
26
Views
3K
B A difficulty with the equivalence of all inertial reference frames
Replies
28
Views
3K
I Speed of Light in Inertial Ref Frames: Photon Perspective
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Are All Particle-Rest Inertial Frames the Same?
Replies
4
Views
1K
B How can any physical body truly be at rest?
Replies
24
Views
3K
B Einstein thought experiment confusion: “light clock in a moving frame”
Replies
5
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top