Redshift and time dilatation of Hawking radiation

timmdeeg
Gold Member
Messages
1,538
Reaction score
342
Micro black holes should in principle be observable by emitting Hawking radiation. However, as this takes place extremely close to the event horizon, shouldn't one expect then extreme redshifting (z = 1/(1-Rs/R)^-1/2 -1, Rs = Schwarzschildradius, R = Radius of Emission) and time dilatation?
In other words, shouldn't see the far away observer the Hawking radiation almost 'frozen'? How long does it take to reach him in far away coordinates?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
timmdeeg, It's important to remember that Hawking radiation is fundamentally a quantum process, and therefore one shouldn't try to take a view of it which is purely mechanistic. All one can say is that the vacuum "in" state contains near future null infinity a thermal bath of outward-going particles. For example where are the particles created? In the vicinity of the hole. You can't say whether it occurs on the surface or near the surface - it is a global effect. And in fact the predominant wavelength of the created particles is about as large as the hole itself.
 
Bill_K said:
All one can say is that the vacuum "in" state contains near future null infinity a thermal bath of outward-going particles. For example where are the particles created? In the vicinity of the hole. You can't say whether it occurs on the surface or near the surface - it is a global effect. And in fact the predominant wavelength of the created particles is about as large as the hole itself.
Thank you, Bill, your answer is very helpful. So, if the wavelenght is in the order of the black hole, the redshift is much less significant than I was anticipating it. But there should still be some redshift, as the photon climbs out of the gravity well of the hole, right? Are there any calculations?

You mentioned the thermal bath. Could you kindly explain, whether there is any physical difference between Unruh radiation and Hawking radiation near the horizon?
 
the Hawking radiation is already expressed for an asymptotic observer, so there's no additional redshift
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Ok, thanks for clarifying.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top