How do we account for all the elements in the Universe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CramerTV
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements Universe
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the creation of elements in the universe, particularly in relation to the solar system's formation timeline. It highlights that light elements originated from the Big Bang, while heavier elements were produced in supernovae, with massive stars playing a crucial role. Questions are raised about the number of supernovae required to generate sufficient elements for the solar system and the Milky Way galaxy, suggesting that early supernovae were common and contributed significantly to heavy element abundance. Additionally, there is curiosity about tracing the origins of these elements back to specific supernovae events. The conversation emphasizes the complex interplay of stellar lifecycles and nucleosynthesis in understanding cosmic element formation.
CramerTV
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

New to the forum - first post.

I've wondered for a while how all the elements were able to be created given the timeline of the universe.

If the solar system is ~5billion years old and the universe is 14 billion years old that means that all of the elements of the solar system would have been created in ~9 billion years.

I've read that all of the higher numbered elements (above iron) were created in supernovae and that a star must have a mass 4 or 5 times times the sun in order to become a supernova.

Further, a star 4 to 5 times the mass of the sun probably has a lifetime of somewhere between 100 million years to 1 billion years.

Also the milky way, is ~13 billion years old.

First, how many supernovae would have been needed to create all the elements (in sufficient quantity) to create our solar system (including the sun) (assuming an "average" sized supernova)? Would just one do it? Meaning could one supernova of say 10 solar masses created enough elements to form our solar system and when it exploded in every direction and enough of that material coalesced into our solar system?

Second, how many supernovae would be needed to create all the elements in our galaxy? I'm assuming our galaxy started with enough energy and light elements to create stars and start the process of creating heavier elements.

Lastly, is there any way to determine where our solar system came from? Obviously at least one supernova created all the higher elements found on the Earth so do we know 'where' that supernova was about 6 billion years ago?

Thanks in advance!
 
Space news on Phys.org
CramerTV said:
Hi all,

New to the forum - first post.

I've wondered for a while how all the elements were able to be created given the timeline of the universe.

If the solar system is ~5billion years old and the universe is 14 billion years old that means that all of the elements of the solar system would have been created in ~9 billion years.

I've read that all of the higher numbered elements (above iron) were created in supernovae and that a star must have a mass 4 or 5 times times the sun in order to become a supernova.

Further, a star 4 to 5 times the mass of the sun probably has a lifetime of somewhere between 100 million years to 1 billion years.

Also the milky way, is ~13 billion years old.

First, how many supernovae would have been needed to create all the elements (in sufficient quantity) to create our solar system (including the sun) (assuming an "average" sized supernova)? Would just one do it? Meaning could one supernova of say 10 solar masses created enough elements to form our solar system and when it exploded in every direction and enough of that material coalesced into our solar system?

Second, how many supernovae would be needed to create all the elements in our galaxy? I'm assuming our galaxy started with enough energy and light elements to create stars and start the process of creating heavier elements.

Lastly, is there any way to determine where our solar system came from? Obviously at least one supernova created all the higher elements found on the Earth so do we know 'where' that supernova was about 6 billion years ago?

Thanks in advance!

Hi Cramer,

The light elements such as hydrogen, helium, lithium, etc. were produced in the nucleosynthesis following the big bang. All of the heavy elements were, as you said, produced in supernovae.

For the formation and evolution of the solar system, this should be good:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formation_and_evolution_of_the_Solar_System
 
Supernova appear to have been very common in the early universe. Many of these early stars were incredibly massive and probably only lived a handful of million years before detonating, so heavy element abundance is unsurprising. Most of the heavy elements found on Earth were probably generated by second and third generation stars.
 
Chronos said:
Most of the heavy elements found on Earth were probably generated by second and third generation stars.

I thought only pop II would generate the really heavy elements. Pop III would generate only the lighter ones, up to Fe or so. Guess I should get some facts on that.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top