Why proton test charges and not electrons?

AI Thread Summary
Electric fields are conventionally depicted using positive test charges, primarily due to historical definitions associating protons with positive charge. This choice has led to confusion regarding the direction of current flow, as it contrasts with the actual movement of electrons, which are negatively charged. The discussion emphasizes the utility of vector-field concepts and relativistic notation to clarify these issues, particularly in understanding electric currents. It is noted that positive charges can also flow and generate currents in various contexts, such as in solutions and semiconductors. Ultimately, the historical preference for protons as positive charges has shaped the conventional understanding of electric fields and currents.
AKBrown
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
When picturing electric fields, they are always based on a positive test charge. As you move on to potential difference and electrical currents, it is based more on electrons/negative charge. So, why aren't electric fields and fields lines based on a negative test charge instead of a positive test charge?

Thank you for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is just historical. For some reason one has defined what's now known to be carried by protons as the positive charge. There is a lot of confusion in the literature, talking about "technical direction of current" vs. "real direction of current" and similar gibberish.

It's way easier to just use the vector-field concept to understand these issues. The best is to use even relativistic four-dimensional notation right away. E.g., the electric four-current of a fluid with number density n_0 of charge carriers is given by

j^{\mu}=q n_0 u^{\mu}=q n_0 \gamma \begin{pmatrix}c \\ \vec{v} \end{pmatrix}, \quad \gamma=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\vec{v}^2/c^2}}.

Here, q is the charge of one particle (+e >0 for protons, -e<0 for electrons), c the speed of light, n_0 the density of the fluid as measured in the local rest frame of the fluid cell, and \vec{v} the flow-velocity field.

The sign of the total current through a cross section then is uniquely defined by the spatial components of this current-density vector and the orientation of the cross-sectional area:

I=\int_{A} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{A} \cdot \vec{j}.
 
They originally thought that electricity in wires was a flow of positive charges. I guess everything else derives from that erroneous conclusion.
 
Positive charges can also flow and create currents, for instance in solutions, in your body, in the ionosphere. Even in semiconductors, positive charges (holes) can flow and create currents. Just because electrons are the ones moving in metals and humans like to make useful electronic devices out of metals does not make the electrons special when in comes to electrical currents.
 
Back
Top