Circularly Polarized Wave: Poynting Vector Analysis

AI Thread Summary
The Poynting vector for a circularly polarized wave is not circularly polarized; it is directed along the direction of wave propagation. Unlike linearly polarized waves, where the magnitude of the Poynting vector fluctuates periodically, the Poynting vector for circularly polarized waves maintains a constant net power without fluctuation. This distinction highlights the differences in energy flow between the two types of polarization. Understanding these characteristics is crucial for applications in wave propagation and electromagnetic theory. The analysis of the Poynting vector provides insight into the behavior of energy in circularly polarized waves.
xnoiz
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
In case of a circularly polarized wave, is the poynting vector also circularly polarized?

If not what happens in this case?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
no, the poynting vector is directed in the direction of propagation.
 
xnoiz said:
In case of a circularly polarized wave, is the poynting vector also circularly polarized?

If not what happens in this case?
One difference is that for a uniform linearly polarized wave, magnitude of Poynting vector fluctuates periodically between zero and maximum at twice the wave frequency. For a similar circularly polarized wave there is no fluctuation in net power.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top