Varification needed for small trigonometrical Fourier series, PRESSING

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on verifying the Fourier series representation of the function x(t) = 1/2 + cos(t) + cos(2t). The user correctly identifies that a0 = 1/2 and that all bn coefficients are zero due to the even nature of the function. However, confusion arises in calculating the an coefficients, where the user initially finds them to be zero, contrary to the expected result of an = 1. Clarifications indicate that the integration process must be revisited, as the correct application of the Fourier series formula should yield consistent results with the original function. The thread emphasizes the importance of careful calculation and verification in Fourier series analysis.
toneboy1
Messages
172
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I have x(t) = 1/2 + cos(t) + cos(2t)

so I can see that a0 = 1/2
and that it is an even function so there is no bn
Also that T = 2pi so
an = 2/2pi ∫02pi x(t).cos(nω0t) dt

but when I integrate this I get an = 0 yet I've been told that the answer is

x(t) = 1/2 + Ʃn = 12 cos(nω0t)

which would mean that an = 1, but I'm not sure how.

Anyone?

Thanks heaps!EDIT: I just found another related problem I'm struggling with if anyone's interested:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=654607
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
This has been adequately addressed already. Your x(t) is already a Fourier series. If you computed the coefficients to be different you made a math error.
 


Hello,

Thank you for sharing your question and concern about verification for small trigonometrical Fourier series. It seems like you have correctly identified that x(t) is an even function, which means that all the bn terms will be equal to zero. However, the issue you are facing is with calculating the an terms.

In order to verify the small trigonometrical Fourier series, you will need to use the formula for calculating the an terms:

an = 2/T ∫0T x(t).cos(nω0t) dt

In your case, T = 2π and ω0 = 1, so the formula becomes:

an = 2/2π ∫0 2π [1/2 + cos(t) + cos(2t)].cos(nt) dt

Now, when you integrate this, you will get:

an = 1/π [sin(nt) + 1/2 sin(t) + 1/4 sin(2t)] evaluated from 0 to 2π

Since the sine function is periodic with a period of 2π, sin(nt) evaluated at 2π will be equal to sin(0) = 0. Similarly, sin(2t) evaluated at 2π will also be equal to sin(0) = 0. This leaves us with:

an = 1/π [1/2 sin(t)] evaluated from 0 to 2π

Using the fact that sin(t) is also an odd function, we know that sin(t) evaluated at 0 will be equal to 0 and sin(t) evaluated at 2π will also be equal to 0. Therefore, the an terms will be equal to 0, which is the same result you got.

However, when you use the formula for the Fourier series, you will get:

x(t) = 1/2 + Ʃn = 1^2 cos(nω0t) = 1/2 + cos(t) + cos(2t)

So, there must be a mistake in the formula you were using to calculate the an terms. I suggest double-checking the formula and making sure you are using the correct values for T and ω0.

As for the related problem you mentioned, I recommend posting it on a physics forum or discussing it with a colleague or mentor who has experience with Fourier series. They may be able to
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top