Convert 2000 Ft Lbs Torque to Pounds - Electric Brake

  • Thread starter Thread starter leverage
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
AI Thread Summary
To convert 2000 ft lbs of torque into linear weight at the end of a 100-foot lever, the calculation yields 20 lbs of force. The distance from the fulcrum significantly affects the force achievable with the same torque; the closer the weight is to the fulcrum, the greater the force. The diameter of the brake is primarily relevant for calculating torque but does not influence the linear weight conversion. Understanding the relationship between torque, lever length, and weight placement is crucial for accurate calculations. Proper application of these principles allows for effective use of electric brakes in various scenarios.
leverage
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know how to convert 2000 ft lbs of torque into linear weight? I have an electric brake capable of holding 2000 lbs of torque. But i don't know how to convert to actual pounds that can hold. It also involves a 100 foot lever( boom). What would the force in pounds be? the brake itself is about 15 inches in diameter.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on how far from the fulcrum the weight is attached. The closer to the fulcrum, the higher the force you can achieve with the same torque.
“Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world.” Archimedes
 
leverage said:
Does anyone know how to convert 2000 ft lbs of torque into linear weight? [...] It also involves a 100 foot lever( boom).
If I understand you correctly that you need to know how much weight can be supported at the end of a 100 foot boom by 2000 ft lbs, it's 2000 ft lbs / 100ft = 20 lb. If it's some other distance from the pivot, substituted that into the same formula.

Diameter of the brake itself is only relevant in computing the torque. Once you know the torque, it doesn't make a difference.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top