Instagram may sell photos for advertising

  • Thread starter Thread starter jtbell
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photos
AI Thread Summary
The new terms of use for Instagram, effective January 16, introduce significant changes regarding user rights, particularly in how the platform can utilize user-generated content. Instagram now has the authority to sell users' photos and personal details to businesses for advertising purposes without providing any compensation to the users. This includes a non-exclusive, royalty-free license for Instagram to use any content posted on the platform. Concerns have been raised about the lack of clarity in these terms, prompting some users to consider deleting their accounts before the new terms take effect. An example highlighted is a case where a family's vacation photo was used in a large advertisement without their consent, illustrating the risks of sharing images online. Users are advised to be cautious about posting content and to consider using lower resolution images to mitigate potential misuse.
jtbell
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
16,023
Reaction score
7,623
The new terms of use, effective January 16, are littered with changes throughout -- but the biggest changes came in the section about users' rights. "A business or other entity may pay" Instagram to display users' photos and other details "in connection with paid or sponsored content or promotions, without any compensation to you."

Instagram can now sell your photos for ads (cnn.com)
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
I have used instagram for a brief period. It may not be easy for long time users, but, IMO if you don't agree with the terms of use, get out.
 
So, "All your face are belong to us!"
 
They seem to be backpeddling:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-20777616

Having never had a Facebook account I don't know much about it, but family members do so I've been concerned about it and IMO if I had an Instagram account I'd delete it before Jan 16, don't trust them if they cannot even clearly state their intentions.
 
lol wow, there really is nothing confusing about the intentions of

"You hereby grant to Instagram a non-exclusive, fully paid and royalty-free, transferable, sub-licensable, worldwide license to use the content that you post on or through the service."

or

"a business or other entity may pay us to display your username, likeness, photos, and/or actions you take, in connection with paid or sponsored content or promotions, without any compensation to you."

shameful
 
LOL..

instagram.png
 
There was a recent case where a family's holiday picture became a large sign in Prague advertising a grocery store and was noticed by one of their friends visiting the city.

The store had gotten the picture from the web. It was high enough resolution for the them to blow up it really big and display it on their billboard.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8094420.stm

The moral of the story is not to post pictures to the web and if you do use a reduced resolution and make sure you brush your teeth if you're smiling.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
80
Views
68K
Replies
65
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
502K
Back
Top