Spreading of a pulse as it propagates in a dispersive medium

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aguss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Medium Pulse
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the propagation of a pulse in a dispersive medium, specifically addressing the mathematical formulation of the problem. The user begins with the expression for a one-dimensional pulse and derives the function A(k) based on initial conditions, considering the case where the time derivative of the pulse is zero. They introduce a Gaussian-modulated oscillation as the initial pulse shape and seek clarification on how to derive the expression for A(k) from this initial condition. The solution involves rewriting the cosine term in exponential form, completing the square, and applying Gaussian integral techniques, which ultimately leads to resolving the integral successfully. The user expresses gratitude for the assistance and confirms they were able to solve the problem.
Aguss
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone!
I am studying the spreading of a pulse as it propagates in a dispersive medium, from a well known book. My problem arise when i have to solve an expression.

Firstly i begin considering that a 1-dim pulse can be written as:


u(x,t) = 1/2*1/√2∏* ∫A(k)*exp(ikx-iw(k)t) dk + cc (complex conjugate)


and then i showed that A(k) can be express in terms of the initial values of the problem, taking into account that w(k)=w(-k) (isotropic medium):

A(k) = 1/√2∏ ∫ exp(-ikx) * (u(x,0) + i/w(k) * du/dt (x,0)) dx

I considered du/dt(x,0)=0 which means that the problems involves 2 pulses with the same amplitud and velocity but oposite directions.
So A(k) takes the form:

A(k) = 1/√2∏ ∫ exp(-ikx) * u(x,0)

Now i take a Gaussian modulated oscilattion as the initial shape of the pulse:

u(x,0) = exp(-x^2/2L^2) cos(ko x)


Then the book says that we can easily reach to the expression:

A(k) = 1/√2∏ ∫ exp(-ikx) exp(-x^2/2L^2) cos (ko x) dx



= L/2 (exp(-(L^2/2) (k-ko)^2) + exp(-(L^2/2) (k+ko)^2)

How did he reach to this?? How can i solve this last integral?


Then, with the expression of A(k) into u(x,t) arise other problem. How can i solve this other integral.


Thank you very much for helping me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
that is a trick.you have to write cos(k0x) as Re(eik0x),you will get only exponentials then you will have to complete the square in powers of exponentials and use of a simple gaussian integral.
0 e(-x2)dx=√∏/2
 
Thank you so much! I could solve it! It wasnt too hard after all :) thanks again.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Back
Top