Acadamia vs. Industry - supervisors role

  • Thread starter Thread starter Apteronotus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Industry
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the motivations of supervisors in guiding Ph.D. students toward academic careers versus industry positions. It highlights that while there may be some financial incentives related to the prestige of certain research areas, the primary motivations for supervisors are often non-financial. Many professors, particularly in fields like physics, may perceive industry roles as a failure and view academic positions as a success, which can influence their guidance. This perception varies by individual, discipline, and institution, reflecting a complex interplay of personal and professional factors in the academic landscape.
Apteronotus
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
Acadamia vs. Industry -- supervisors role

Is there an incentive for supervisors to guide their Ph.D. students to follow an academic career rather than move to industry?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Is there an incentive for supervisors to guide their Ph.D. students to follow an academic career rather than move to industry?


Yes, but I think it is mostly non-financial - there may be financial benefit if their area of study is bigger and more prestigious, but every researcher in the same field is also (sometimes indirect) competition for limited dollars. I don't think either of those have much impact, but I'd be interested if others disagree.

You didn’t specify a discipline, but assuming you’re discussing physics, many professors see industry as failure and academia as success, and some part of their ego is tied up in getting students into academic positions. Obviously this varies by individual, by specialty and by institution.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
37
Views
9K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Back
Top