On carbon, methane and electromagnetic radiation

AI Thread Summary
Electromagnetic waves are produced by molecular vibrations and electron transitions, with frequency correlating to the energy differences in orbitals. Methane is considered a stronger greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide due to its multiple vibrational modes, allowing it to absorb a wider range of infrared frequencies emitted by the Earth. Energy loss from vibrating molecules does not change their specific frequency of emitted light, as each molecule has a defined absorption spectrum. The concept of "magnetic waves" appears to refer to electromagnetic waves, which propagate through space until they interact with matter. Light travels indefinitely in a vacuum until absorbed, and the behavior of photons can be understood as continuous motion until an interaction occurs.
Tweedle Dee
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
iTunes University layman looking for answers and willing to do the work – just need some direction.

I now understand electromagnetic waves can be created when molecules vibrate – which they all do. I understand the frequency of the light correlates to the frequency of the molecular vibration – which is itself a result of the mass of the individual vibrating adams and the strength of the molecular bonds.

And, I understand that a “bombarded” adam generates electromagnetic waves when the electron drops back to a lower energy state. I understand the resulting energy of the electromagnetic wave – the frequency – correlates to the energy difference between the two energy orbitals. The electrons travel around the nucleus in waves by “choosing” specific complete-orbital-wave frequencies and distances from the nucleus, otherwise that orbital could not exist because out-of-phase waves would cancel each other out as the electron “circles” the nucleus.

I believe the the resulting lightwaves, either from vibrating molecules or from electrons dropping to a lower energy state, generate resulting magnetic waves, and those very magnetic waves generate “new” lightwaves.

OK - a few questions...

I am told, methane is a “stronger” greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. Why? I understand that there are multiple vibrational directions or “degrees of freedom” for each bonded adam within the molecule because adams vibrate in a three-dimensional world. Is it that methane is vibrating with a greater number of frequencies and can therefore absorb a greater number of frequencies? But, isn’t the Earth is emitting infrared radiation at a specific frequency? And, doesn’t the Earth's infrared frequency change slightly from one day to the next as the earth’s temperature changes?

Which brings me to the next question…
As the vibrating molecules give off more and more energy – photons – don’t the molecules lose energy? And, if they lose energy does their vibration change? And if the vibration changes then the frequency of the light would change. Which I know is not true because molecules of a specific type give off a specific frequency.

And lastly...
Do the magnetic waves that are propagated from lightwaves create new lightwaves that amplify the original lightwaves? Which then create new magnetic waves and the cycle continues? And if so, is that why light travels forever? (Or at least for 13 1/2 billion light-years as far as we know.) Or does light travel forever because a body in motion (a photon) remains in motion?

I’m happy to read further on my own. I just need some direction.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The picture you have of discrete vibrational frequencies, and therefore a discrete absorbtion spectrum, only works for an isolated molecule. In a gas, where you have lots of them, collisions and interactions between the molecules, along with the Doppler effect, transforms discrete absorption into a continuous absorption band. The amount of absorption will change as a function of the frequency of the light.

To figure out which gas is a stronger green house gas, you have figure out what the emission of the Earth looks like in the infrared region, and then see how much of that will be absorbed by the different gases.

And I do not know what you mean by "magnetic wave". Do you mean electromagnetic wave? In that case, it is the same as a light wave, with the name light wave only applying to a small part of the full electromagnetic spectrum (from the infrared to the ultra-violet).
 
Tweedle Dee said:
Do the magnetic waves that are propagated from lightwaves create new lightwaves that amplify the original lightwaves? Which then create new magnetic waves and the cycle continues? And if so, is that why light travels forever? (Or at least for 13 1/2 billion light-years as far as we know.) Or does light travel forever because a body in motion (a photon) remains in motion?

The electromagnitic wave just propagates freely in space until it encounters an object. I don't think that "a body in motion" is the best way to talk about photons, but if it helps you to see it that way, the photon just travels in space until it is absoebed by something.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top