G Forces experienced by human if rotated inside a giant hampster wheel

AI Thread Summary
To keep a human of 70kg unrestrained inside a giant wheel with a 30m radius, the wheel must rotate at an angular speed of approximately 0.58 rad/s, where the gravitational force equals the centrifugal force at the top, resulting in zero g-force. At the bottom of the wheel, the human would experience a maximum g-force of 2G due to the combination of gravitational and centrifugal forces. If the radius increases to 40m while maintaining the same angular velocity, the g-force felt at the bottom would rise to approximately 2.3G. Walking along the inside surface of the wheel is theoretically possible but would be challenging due to the rapid changes in g-force. This discussion highlights the fascinating intersection of physics and architectural design.
tiob_
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am working on an a project that consists of a giant wheel with a 30m radius that will be rotating at a velocity fast enough to keep a human on the inside surface of the wheel without being attached.

Please refer to 30s in for reference of similar motion performed by a hamster:

Can somebody please help me in calculating the speed at which the wheel needs to rotate to keep a human (70kg) unrestrained freely rotating around the inside of the wheel?

And secondly, how to calculate the varying G-forces exerted at the bottom, top and sides of the wheel.

Thirdly, I am assuming that theoretically it would be possible for the human to then begin to walk a long the inside surface during the rotation?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have any idea how to go about doing the calculations you are asking for? It is not the intent of this forum to simply provide answers. If you try it yourself and get stuck, we're here to help.

If you know absolutely nothing about how to do this, then perhaps you should think of a different project.
 
edit- didn't see reply #1 when I clicked reply! Not sure what to do now...
The person is most likely to fall when at the very top of the wheel, and at a certain rotational speed, the force required to keep him in circular motion can be made equal to his own weight (which acts through the axis of rotation). You can find this by equating the two quantities, mg = mrw^2. The weight of the human doesn't play a part in the calculation after cancellation, and if r = 30 then it leaves you with an angular speed of sqrt(10/30) = 0.58 rad/s.

At this point the reaction from the floor will be momentarily zero, and the g-force is zero because the man is essentially in free-fall. Regarding the rest of the rotation, the force that the rotating man experiences (in his non-inertial frame) is mg from gravity (down) plus mg from centrifugal (outward). The highest force he feels is at the bottom where it is exactly 2G.

It should be possible to walk along the inside certainly, although it will be very tricky as the reaction force below his feet goes from 0 to 2G every 6 seconds.
 
Sorry phinds, for not posting my attempt. As you can see its my first post. I did an A level in physics, but it was a while ago. My brain has since been filled with architectural jargon.

And thank you very much MickeyW. This is actually what I got but for some reason I thought it seemed too little a value.

I see a very interesting architectural proposition coming out of this.

Reminds me of this project. http://www.julijonasurbonas.lt/p/euthanasia-coaster/

Thanks guys.
 
Last edited:
So just elaborate on this, if the wheel stays at a constant angular velocity of 0.571 rad/s and the radius of the wheel gets altered to 40m.

Would g increase to 13.04?

mg=mrw^2
g=40x0.571^2
g=13.04

and thus the force felt at the bottom of the wheel 9.81+13.04 = 2.3G?
 
Last edited:
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top