Radiation absorption and temperature changes in matter

Alexander83
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Hi there,
I've been studying mechanisms by which high-energy radioactive decay products (beta particles, x-rays, gamma rays) are attenuated as they pass through matter. From my readings in introductory and intermediate level textbooks, the general mechanisms by which these particles and rays are described as interacting with matter generally involves interactions with electrons in the target material either causing ionization or electronic excitation.

My gut feeling is that the net effect of all of these interactions will (eventually) be an increase in the temperature of the target material. The mechanisms that are commonly described in books for attenuation of radiation such as photoionization or Compton scatter in the case of photons, or Bremsstrahlung production or collisional ionization in the case of energetic electrons. These mechanisms would seem to result in the production of simply more particles (free electrons) or photons in the target material.

My (very) naive understanding of what a change temperature means in a solid structure would be something along the lines of excitation of vibrational or rotational modes in an atomic lattice with the resulting increase in the kinetic energy of the atoms of the substance resulting in what we perceive as an increase in temperature... is this correct?

My question then is this: how do the interactions I mentioned earlier ultimately result in a temperature change in the target? My gut feeling is that secondary radiation produced in a target continuously decreases in energy level until it is at the correct energy level to excite vibrational or rotational modes in the target, causing what we think of at a macroscopic level as "heating" but I can't find anywhere where this is spelled out. Introductory texts seldom go into much detail much beyond discussing the mechanism of the initial attenuation of high energy radiation and not subsequent steps.

Thanks for you time!

Chris.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All charged particles are ionizing (and the slow electrons then collide with atoms and other electrons and heat the material) and/or directly transfer momentum to atoms (-> heat). Neutral particles can hit nuclei, or produce secondary radiation with charged particles.
If heating due to radiation is significant, the radiation levels are really high.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
mfb, thanks for the post. I think I'm trying to ask about the process that you described as

"the slow electrons then collide with atoms and other electrons and heat the material"

I think I'm struggling to think about what it means to say that the material is heated... is this an excitation of vibration of the atoms in a lattice in solids which is what we conceive of as a temperature increase? If that's the case, why is it that slower moving particles cause this excitation and heating and not higher energy particles?

Chris
 
Excitation of vibrations of atoms and excitations of electrons.

If that's the case, why is it that slower moving particles cause this excitation and heating and not higher energy particles?
Both do it, but the high-energy particles tend to transfer high energies to particles they "hit", so it takes some steps to get to thermal energies (~1/40 eV at room temperature).
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Back
Top