Finding the Optimal Aperture Stop for a Portrait Photo

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aelo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photo
AI Thread Summary
To determine the optimal aperture stop for a portrait photo at a distance of 6 m, the photographer needs to limit image blur to one pixel, approximately 0.26 mm. The depth of field (DOF) equation is crucial, and the photographer is considering f/4, f/8, or f/16 to achieve a DOF of about 0.5 m. There is confusion regarding the sensor pixel size and its relation to the aperture diameter (D) and the F-number (F#). The photographer is contemplating whether to apply the paraxial approximation and how to calculate the necessary parameters for each aperture setting. Ultimately, the goal is to find the aperture that yields the desired depth of field while maintaining sharpness within the constraints of the given equipment.
Aelo
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A photographer is taking a portrait photo of a person at 6 m distance from his digital camera, which has a sensor pixel size of 10 μm and is equipped with a f = 100 mm thin lens. Image blur is supposed to be limited to the size of one pixel. Which of the following aperture stops: f/4, f/8, or f/16 should the photographer select in order to get a depth of field of about 0.5 m?

Homework Equations



Depth of field = δz = (2*l*ρ*D)/(D2 - ρ2)
ρ = -ρ'*l/l' = ρ'[(l/f) -1]
F# relates to f such that, if F# = 8, you have an f/8 aperture stop.
Using the paraxial approximation for a single lens, F# = f/D
For a single lens with diameter D and a stop at the lens, NA = D/(2*f)
F# = 1/(2*NA) by definition
For a general system, F# = f/(2*he) with he being the height of the entrance pupil

The Attempt at a Solution



We know ρ' = 1 pixel ≈ 0.26 mm. l = 6000 mm. I'm not sure what sensor pixel size describes - is it D? If it is, I'm confused about when I can use F# = f/D. I know the paraxial approximation is used only at very small angles, so maybe that equation isn't valid when we're 6 m away. Maybe I can't use that, but if the sensor pixel size is D, I could plug into the NA equation - but again, I feel that this would be too simple, so I think I'm oversimplifying it. Since I'm given ρ', l, and f, I could find ρ, and maybe I'm supposed to find ρ for each of the different f's (using the given F#'s and multiplying by D)and just plug into the δz equation to see which gives me the result closest to 0.5 m. This confuses me somewhat as f was given to be 100 mm, so how could f be anything else?
Thanks in advance. :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Bump. :(
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Back
Top