Calculate the tension in the rope

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathewsMD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rope Tension
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the tension in the rope from which a gymnast hangs, the mass of the gymnast (36.7 kg) and the angle (4.0°) are used to derive the tension formula T = mg/2sin(θ), resulting in a tension of 2578 N. The discussion clarifies that the tension can be treated as two separate strings at the point where the gymnast is attached, especially when considering different angles on each side. If the gymnast is not centered, the tensions on either side will differ, which is acceptable as it reflects the physical setup of the situation. The tension is not uniform in this case due to the angles, and the gymnast's attachment point will adjust to reach equilibrium if not fixed. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurate calculations in tension scenarios.
MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7
If the gymnast has a mass, m = 36.7 kg, and the angle θ = 4.0°, calculate the tension in the rope from which she is hanging.

XKiKv5l.png


ƩFx = T1x - T2x = 0
Then T1cos4 = T2cos4
T1 = T2 = T

ƩFy = 2Ty - mg
2Tsin4 = mg
T = mg/2sin4 = 2578 N

I have gotten the solution. I am just confused at one part. Do we analyze the tension in the string on each side of the gymnast separately, then add them together? Or, do we just find the tension on one side and that is it (like my solution)?

I am just confused since I remember learning tension in a massless rope is considered to be uniform, but if there is a force being applied to a part of it (this time in the middle) I don't know if we're supposed to analyze tension together or not since it is essentially a node and I considered it like I would two separate strings in my solution.

Also, if the gymnast was not in the middle of the string (i.e. θ1 = 6.0° and θ2 = 10.0°) how would this change the situation and the resultant tension in the rope. Would it have any effect?

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are right to treat it as two separate strings, for exactly the reason that you said: you can treat any point in the rope as a node and require that the forces on it all cancel (as long as the rope isn't accelerating, of course).

If you change the angles, then it becomes even more important to think about it this way, because in general the tension in the two sides will be different. That sounds like a violation of the rule that the tension is uniform throughout the rope, but it's not. The only way of getting different angles is to physically hook the gymnast to a particular point on the rope, and then you really have two separate ropes connected to the eye of the hook, each with their own tension.

(If you don't have that fixed hook, the gymnast's attachment point will slide down the rope until we reach equilibrium with the tensions and angles equal).
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Nugatory said:
You are right to treat it as two separate strings, for exactly the reason that you said: you can treat any point in the rope as a node and require that the forces on it all cancel (as long as the rope isn't accelerating, of course).

If you change the angles, then it becomes even more important to think about it this way, because in general the tension in the two sides will be different. That sounds like a violation of the rule that the tension is uniform throughout the rope, but it's not. The only way of getting different angles is to physically hook the gymnast to a particular point on the rope, and then you really have two separate ropes connected to the eye of the hook, each with their own tension.

(If you don't have that fixed hook, the gymnast's attachment point will slide down the rope until we reach equilibrium with the tensions and angles equal).

Thank you!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top