How Do Function Transformations Work?

AI Thread Summary
Horizontal translations of functions, such as f(x + c), shift the graph left when c is positive because each x-value must decrease by c to maintain the same output. Stretching and compressing affect the graph's shape; for example, f(ax) compresses the graph horizontally by a factor of A, while Af(x) stretches it vertically by a factor of A. The transformation f(ax) results in a horizontal compression rather than stretching by A, as it effectively reduces the x-values needed to achieve the same output. Graphically comparing f(x) and f(x + C) illustrates that the x-intercept shifts left, confirming the translation effect. Understanding these transformations is crucial for accurately manipulating and interpreting function graphs.
WannabeFeynman
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hello all, I need some help to clear my doubts.

Why does a horizontal translation (f(x + c)) move to the left if c is positive?

Can someone graphically explain what effect a stretch and compression (vertical and horizontal) has on the original parent function?

Similar to the first question, why does f(ax) actually stretch by a factor of 1/a instead of a?

Thanks, I might have more questions later.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Is you graph y1=f(x) and y2=f(x+C) and then compare them, whatever "y1" you see at any "x1" will be seen to the left (assuming C>0) at x2="x1-C" for y2 because y2 = f(x2+C) = f(x1-C+C) = f(x1) = y1.
Similarly:
f(Ax) will horizontally thin the graph by a factor of "A" (or stretch it by 1/A)
Af(x) will vertically stretch the graph by a factor of "A".
 
Take a look at this simple example, suppose ##f(x)=x##, a simple straight line through the origin. If ##x=0##, then ##f(x)=0## as well. But if you take ##f(x+a)##, the origin will be at ##-a##. If you draw the line, the origin will move to the left because the origin is now in negative part of the x-axis.
 
Seydlitz said:
Take a look at this simple example, suppose ##f(x)=x##, a simple straight line through the origin. If ##x=0##, then ##f(x)=0## as well. But if you take ##f(x+a)##, the origin will be at ##-a##. If you draw the line, the origin will move to the left because the origin is now in negative part of the x-axis.
The origin doesn't move around, but the x-intercept does.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top