How to Find the Area of a Triangle Using Basic Trigonometry?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MechatronO
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trigonometry
AI Thread Summary
To find the area of a triangle formed by a line at an angle A1 from a centerpoint of a circle with radius R, and at a distance D from the center, the Law of Sines is applied. The user calculates angles A2 and A4 using trigonometric identities, ultimately expressing the area as B*H/2, where H is the height derived from the sine of angle A1. The discussion highlights the complexity of the solution and questions if a simpler method exists. The user acknowledges a typo in referring to the Law of Cosines instead of the Law of Sines. Further suggestions for a more straightforward approach are welcomed.
MechatronO
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
We got a circle with a radius R.

From a distance D from the centerpoint a line is inserted at an offset angle A1 from a line drawn though the centerpoint C of the circle, see the picture below.

http://cdn.imghack.se/medium/0861cdab13b8957018f8e167342f2b8e.png

I would like the are of the red triangle, provided D, R and A1.

I drew another triangle with one of its corner in the circles center for help, extracted the angle A2, got H and could then solve the problem but. However I wonder if there is a neater way than this.

What I did:

A3 = 180°-A1

Law of cosines give

sin (A3) / R = (sin A4) /D

A4 = arcsin( sin(A3) * D/R ) = arcsin( sin(180°-A1) * D/R)

A2 = 180° - A3 - A4 = 180° - (180°-A1) - arcsin( sin(180°-A1) * D/R) =

= A1 - arcsin( sin(A1)* D/R)

sin(A1) = H/R

H= R*sin(A1)

cos(A2) = (B+D)/R

B= R*cos(A2) -D

The red area = B*H/2 = (R*cos(A2)-D)*R*sin(A2)/2

And so forth. However, I get the feeling that this solution is more complicated than necessary?

EDIT: Btw the circle hasn't got much to do with the problem, but I'm just using it in a next step.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What you call the Law of Cosines is actually the Law of Sines.
 
Typo.

More suggestions?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top