Can anyone explain to me why eigenvector here is like this

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding eigenvectors and eigenvalues for a matrix A, where the eigenvalues identified are 2, 12, and -6. A participant is confused about obtaining the eigenvector [0, 0, 1] for the eigenvalue -6, questioning its validity since multiplying it by the matrix results in the zero vector. It is clarified that the matrix used in calculations is actually A - (-6)I, leading to the conclusion that the kernel of this matrix should not consist solely of the zero vector. An eigenvector must be a non-zero vector, indicating that [0, 0, 1] is indeed valid as an eigenvector for the eigenvalue -6. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the definition of eigenvectors in relation to the eigenvalue equation.
sozener1
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Im supposed to find the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of A

I found that eigenvalues are 2 12 and -6

then I found eigen vectors substituting -6 to lambda

and someone has told me I get 0 0 1 for eigenvector which I cannot understand why??

can anyone pleasezzzzzzzz explain why this is?
 

Attachments

  • gag.PNG
    gag.PNG
    1.6 KB · Views: 417
  • gss.PNG
    gss.PNG
    5.3 KB · Views: 460
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Did you multiply this vector with your matrix? What do you get?
Does this fit to the definition of an eigenvector?
 
mfb said:
Did you multiply this vector with your matrix? What do you get?
Does this fit to the definition of an eigenvector?

I get 0 0 0

it doesn't fit with the definition of eigenvectors

so does that mean it should be 0 0 0 instead of 0 0 1??

I mean when you try to calculate for v3 = [ v1 v2 v3]


since the last row of the matrix is 0 0 0 should v3 come out as 0?? couldn't v3 be any number??
 
sozener1 said:
I get 0 0 0
That's not what I get.

The matrix you showed in the second attachment is not A. It is [A - (-6)I]. Of course if you multiply this matrix times your eigenvector, you'll get the zero vector.
sozener1 said:
it doesn't fit with the definition of eigenvectors

so does that mean it should be 0 0 0 instead of 0 0 1??

I mean when you try to calculate for v3 = [ v1 v2 v3]


since the last row of the matrix is 0 0 0 should v3 come out as 0?? couldn't v3 be any number??

Assuming that your eigenvalue is λ and that x is an as-yet unknown eigenvector for λ, what you're doing is solving the equation Ax = λx for x. That's equivalent to solving the equation (A - λI)x = 0. In other words, of finding the kernel of the matrix A - λI. This should be something that you have already learned to do.

The kernel here should not consist of only the zero vector - an eigenvector cannot be the zero vector.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top