How can y be solved for given x and all A coefficients in the transfer function?

AI Thread Summary
To solve for y in the given transfer function, one can use numerical methods such as iteration or graphical analysis. The equation is complex due to the presence of multiple sine terms, making analytical solutions challenging. Iterative methods, like the Newton-Raphson method, can provide approximate solutions by refining guesses for y based on the known value of x and coefficients A. Graphical methods involve plotting the function and visually identifying intersections with the line representing x. Both approaches require careful consideration of the function's behavior to ensure convergence to a valid solution for y.
woo78f
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If I have the following transfer function:

x = A1 + A2*y + A3*sin(A4*y + A5) + A6*sin(A7*y + A8) +A9*sin(A10*y + A11) +A12*sin(A13*y + A14)

I know x and all the A coefficients, how would one solve for y?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Either graphically or by iteration.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top