Contribution of Distrance and Speed on Time Taken

  • Thread starter Thread starter harrycool
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed Time
AI Thread Summary
Traveling 1000 kilometers at 100 km/h takes 10 hours, while 600 kilometers at 80 km/h takes 7.5 hours, leading to a total time savings of 2.5 hours by reducing distance. If only the distance is changed to 600 km at 100 km/h, 4 hours are saved, while changing only the speed to 80 km/h for 1000 km results in an additional 2.5 hours. The net effect of these changes indicates that the reduction in distance contributes more significantly to time savings than the reduction in speed. There is no standard method to quantify the individual contributions of distance and speed to overall time savings. The analysis highlights the complexity of comparing these two factors in travel time calculations.
harrycool
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
In Scenario 1. I travel 1000 KMs @ 100 KM/Hr. I reach my destination in 10 Hours.
In Scenario 2. I travel 600 KMs @ 80 KM/Hr. I reach my destination in 7.5 Hours.

How much time do I save due to reduction in distance and how much time is wasted due to reduction in speed?

If I do not change the speed but only change distance (600 KM, 100 KM/Hr), I get 4 hours saved. If I do not change the distance but only the speed (1000KM, 80 KM/Hr), I get 2.5 hours extra. -4 + 2.5 = -1.5. However, in total, I have saved 2.5 hours. So how do I find the contribution of distance and speed in my overall time savings?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
So how do I find the contribution of distance and speed in my overall time savings?
afaik, there is no standard way to compare them. Fortunately, the question does not ask you to.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top