What is the correct way to integrate sqrt(4x) + sqrt(4x) on the interval 0 to 1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathGnome
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrate
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around integrating the function sqrt(4x) + sqrt(4x) over the interval from 0 to 1. The initial confusion stemmed from incorrect simplification and integration attempts. After clarification, it was confirmed that the correct approach involves simplifying to 2 * integral from 0 to 1 of sqrt(4x) dx. The final result of the integration is 8/3 after proper evaluation. The participant expressed gratitude for the assistance in resolving the misunderstanding.
MathGnome
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Ok, I've been doing work for about 4 hours straight and I think my brain is fried. I know this is easy, it is just not working in my head.

Anyway, the problem is this:

Integrate the sqrt(4x) + sqrt(4x) on the interval 0 to 1

I get, (8^3/2)/3 + (8^3/2)/3 but apparently this is not right. I'm probably forgetting something I'll hit myself in the head for :cry:. Any help though?

Thx,
MathGnome

PS: This is not homework.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry, but I'm having trouble seeing what the problem is. Did you mean \int_{0}^{1}\left(\sqrt{4x}+\sqrt{4x}\right)dx? That's what it looks like. If so, you can simplify before integration.
 
apmcavoy said:
I'm sorry, but I'm having trouble seeing what the problem is. Did you mean \int_{0}^{1}\left(\sqrt{4x}+\sqrt{4x}\right)dx? That's what it looks like. If so, you can simplify before integration.
Yep, that's the one.

2\int_{0}^{1}\left(\sqrt{4x}\right)dx (Is this the simplified form?)
 
Last edited:
Alright, you can take the square root of 4. Now you have the following:

4\int_0^1\sqrt{x}dx=\frac{8{\sqrt{x}}^3}{3}\right|_0^1=\boxed{\frac{8}{3}}

Yes, you simplified correctly.
 
Last edited:
Ahh, I see what I did I think. I think I tried to just throw out the 1 and ended up with (8^(3/2))/3

Thanks for the help!
It's hard to stop from taking shortcuts! Argh! :redface:
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top