Gravitational Potential Energy of astronaut

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the mass of an asteroid based on the gravitational potential energy of an astronaut. The astronaut, weighing 120kg, leaves the asteroid's surface with 15J of kinetic energy and reaches a height of 300m. The correct mass of the asteroid is determined to be 3.4*10^12kg. Participants note a potential error in calculations, suggesting that the change in potential energy should be considered rather than the potential energy at the surface. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying gravitational energy equations to obtain accurate results.
Erwin Schrodinger
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
A 120kg astronaut stands on the surface of an asteroid of radius 600m. The astrunaut leaves the surface with 15J of kinetic energy and reaches a maximum height of 300m above the surface. What is the mass of the asteroid? (Answer: 3.4*1012kg)

At the maximum height, all of the kinetic energy becomes potential gravitational energy.

EK = Epg
15 = Gmm'/r
15 = 6.67*10-11*120*m'/(300+600)
1.7*1012kg = m'

I think there's an error in the calculation somewhere because my answer is exactly half the correct answer but I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know but at first sight, you don't take into account the pot. energy at the surface-...does this make sense, like : Kinetic+potenial=converved=15-Gmm'/600=0-Gmm'/900 ??
 
Remember, you want the change in potential energy, not the potential energy itself.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top