History Success on History Test - Celebrate with Me!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Smasherman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thread
AI Thread Summary
A recent history test focused on understanding concepts and the relationships between events rather than rote memorization of dates and names. This approach led to a positive experience, as the test allowed for deeper comprehension, resulting in a successful outcome despite minimal studying. The discussion emphasizes the value of tests that assess understanding and connections over traditional memorization, highlighting a preference for assessments that foster critical thinking and conceptual learning.
Smasherman
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
I took a history test today that was actually good! It didn't involve memorizing dates and names (well, not very much), it involved understanding concepts and the relation of events to other events. So, instead of failing a high-memorization test due to little studying (I have a "good" reason), I did well!

Sorry, I just wanted to share a little crystal of happiness from school amid a glacier of BS. :biggrin:
 
Science news on Phys.org
Smasherman said:
it involved understanding concepts and the relation of events to other events. So, instead of failing a high-memorization test due to little studying (I have a "good" reason), I did well!
It's good to hear you did well on that kind of test. It's the only kind that really matters.
 
THESE are tests that we need. Relationships and concepts tests.
 

Thread 'Songs that pay homage to deceased artists, no covers'

There is a neighboring thread Cover songs versus the original track, which ones are better? https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/cover-songs-versus-the-original-track-which-ones-are-better.1050205/ which is an endless subject and as colorful are the posts there. I came across a Buddy Holly cover by Eva Cassidy only to find out that the Buddy Holly song was already a Paul Anka cover. Anyway, both artists who had covered the song have passed far too early in their lives. That gave me the...
View full post »

Thread 'Why is the plural for moose not meese?'

The piece came-up from the "Lame Jokes" section of the forum. Someobody carried a step from one of the posts and I became curious and tried a brief web search. A web page gives some justification of sorts why we can use goose(s)-geese(p), but not moose(s)-meese(p). Look for the part of the page headed with "Why isn't "meese" the correct plural?" https://languagetool.org/insights/post/plural-of-moose/
View full post »

Similar threads

History 536 AD - The 'Worst' Year in History?
Replies
2
Views
4K
The Scientist as Hero - or not
Replies
1
Views
3K
History The Archimedes Codex: 1600 Years of Human History Upgrade
Replies
2
Views
3K
Electronics How to test whether the circuit board in a UPS still works?
Replies
16
Views
5K
Music Success! Overcoming Patience and Focus Issues in Music
Replies
6
Views
4K
How Does a Former Probation Deputy's Interest in Science Shape His Retirement?
Replies
2
Views
409
Experimental procedure for growing piezoelectric crystals
Replies
6
Views
3K
Lessons From the Millennium Bug
Replies
25
Views
4K
I Have you ever used "symbolic logic" to help you learn calculus?
Replies
5
Views
2K
Studying How can I effectively study for the PGRE?
Replies
7
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top