Poster presentation general questions

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on preparing a poster presentation about the Aurora Borealis for a physics class, with a tight 48-hour deadline. The presenter seeks advice on how to effectively display information, weighing the inclusion of historical perspectives against a purely scientific approach. Suggestions emphasize focusing on scientific facts while possibly incorporating a brief comparison with historical myths. The importance of using credible sources, particularly from government or educational sites, is highlighted due to difficulties in accessing library resources. Overall, the consensus is to prioritize scientific accuracy while making the presentation engaging.
Salerk
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
In my physics class we have been set to do a poster presentation on anything to do with the Earth or atmosphere that has a physics basis.

Before on presentations It's been on a subject I've researched myself so was able to do the Introduction, method, results, discussion.

Because its a random research subject with 48hours to complete this is not possible, and I've decided to try and do the Aurora Borealis.

My question thus is this:

Without being able to do all the research myself when asked to do a poster presentation, how is it best to display the information and results? Do i take a semi historical view point displaying old superstitions leading into research done and the findings and how its taken from the wonder, or does it need to be more scientific.

Any advice on how to go about would be wonderful and come with many thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My grade 7 or 8 public speaking presentation was on the aurora, and in that situation your historical perspective would be great. I wish that I'd thought of it.
For a physics class, though, you'd best stick to pure science. It might not hurt to do a small-scale comparison between reality and aboriginal (or Norse, or whatever) myths, but don't let it get in the way of the facts. There are a lot of teachers in PF who will be glad to tell you what they would expect from a student under your circumstances.
As for the aurora itself, the science is simple on the surface, but you can delve as deeply as you want right down to the quantum mechanical level. While I have never advised anyone to use the Net rather than the library, this might be a job for Google. The information is readily available.
 
thanks for the reply, I've tryed checking in the libary, but eather we have nothing on the aurora or its just been miss referanced and placed in some area, so while i am useing google far to much I am sticking to places that are gov or edu, and pref with full referencing.

yes. any comments from people whom could say what they would be looking for if they set the topic would be most helpfull.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
889
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
580
Replies
16
Views
2K