Polynomial Function Definition Question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A converging infinite series that includes "x" raised to ascending whole number powers does not qualify as a polynomial function. The example provided, f(x) = Σ (x^(2n-1)(-1)^(n+1)/(2n-1)!), represents a power series, not a polynomial, due to the presence of infinitely many nonzero terms. While polynomial functions can be expressed in sigma notation, they must have only finitely many nonzero coefficients. Therefore, the distinction between polynomials and power series is crucial in mathematical analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial functions and their definitions
  • Familiarity with infinite series and convergence concepts
  • Knowledge of sigma notation and its applications in mathematics
  • Basic principles of mathematical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of power series and their convergence criteria
  • Learn about the Taylor series and its relationship to polynomial approximations
  • Explore the differences between polynomials and power series in detail
  • Investigate the role of sigma notation in expressing mathematical functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying calculus or analysis, and anyone interested in the distinctions between polynomial functions and power series.

Quadratic
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if a converging infinite series which includes "x" to ascending whole number powers would fit under the definition of a polynomial function. As an example:

f(x) = [n = 1 -> infinity] Sum(x^(2n-1)(-1)^(n+1)/(2n-1)!)

Also written as:

f(x) = x - x^3/3! + x^5/5! - x^7/7! + x^9/9! ...

Since x stays out of the denominator, and since it will always be to a power of a whole number, I was wondering if it could technically be defined as a polynomial function. It sounds like it can be described as polynomial, but my only concern is that it goes on to infinity, which isn't really a number. Also, I'm not sure if it's proper for polynomials to converge to a number, or to be expressed in sigma notation. (That series converges at Sin(x), where x is an angular measure in radians, btw)

edit: I meant to put this in general math, but I seem to have pressed the wrong button, and I'm not sure how to delete/move it. :/

edit: testing out that LaTeX code thingy...

\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} x^{2n-1}(-1)^{n+1}/(2n-1)!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is actually a good spot for this topic, since infinite sums are (usually) a topic to be addressed with analysis.


It's fine for polynomial to be expressed in sigma notation. For example, the following is a polynomial in x:

<br /> \sum_{k = 0}^{n} c_k x^k<br />

and if only finitely many of the c's are nonzero, then the following is also a polynomial in x:

<br /> \sum_{k = 0}^{+\infty} c_k x^k<br />


However, when you have infinitely many (nonzero) terms it is no longer a polynomial. We call such a thing a power series. Amidst the jungle of all possible functions, power series are among the closest neighbors to polynomials, but alas, they aren't actually polynomials.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K