How do people maintain balance while riding a bicycle or skating?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wangyi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bicycle
AI Thread Summary
Maintaining balance while riding a bicycle or skating relies on movement and the principles of physics. For bicycles, angular momentum from the rotating wheels helps stabilize the rider. In skating, balance is achieved through forward motion, with the body's center of gravity playing a crucial role. The challenge in skating comes from the limited contact area of the skates, making balance more difficult compared to walking. Understanding these dynamics is essential for improving balance in both activities.
wangyi
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have a question:
How does people keep balance when they riding a bicycle or skating? Moving seems to be essential, when riding a bicycle, we can argue that the wheel is rotating, so it's angular momentum keeps the balance. But in the case of skate, nothing is rotating, but people seem to be able to keep balance better when he is moving forward. How to explain it?

Thank you very much and happy new year!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Doesn't skating involve horizontal and vertical projections? Isn't the vertical projection independent of the horizontal projection? What about the center of gravity, doesn't it play a pivotal role in the balance of a body?
 
With skating, you keep your balance exactly the same as if you are walking - it's just a little tougher because the contact area for each foot is essentially 1-dimensional.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top