Collapse of Wave-Functions: What Does it Mean & How to Visualize It?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dlgoff
  • Start date Start date
dlgoff
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,441
Reaction score
3,276
There's an interesting thread on Conciousness in the
Metaphysics & Epistemology forum dealing with the collapse
of wave-functions.

Can someone explain what collapsing a wave function means
and how to visualize it?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of a (Hilbert) complex vector space, where each state vector represents an equivalent wavefunction. According to von Neumann, the probability between unitary states is the projection, or collapse, of the one vector upon the other, always less than or equal to one. (Visualize the projection of a hypotenuse upon a leg.)
 
Thanks for the reply. I just finished watching some Feynman lectures and I'm probably not ready (know enough) to ask.

According to von Neumann, the probability between unitary states is the projection, or collapse, of the one vector upon the other[b/]


Oh, I think I "see". Projection. That makes since. The final observatation\event vector has all other possible state vectors projected upon it? I visualize dominos falling in patterns to a central point. I'll look up hypotenuse and try to understand better. Thanks again.
 
Both the initial and final state vectors project singly upon each other by measurement.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top