How to Reduce Glare off Water by Factor of 1.33: Polarization Physics Problem

sachi
Messages
63
Reaction score
1
"by what factor may the glare off water be reduced when the sun is at

a) 45 degrees above the horizon
b)60 degrees above the horizon

n.b refractive index of water is 1.33"

I have derived the fresnel reflection coefficients for the cases when E is perpendicular to the plane of incidence, and when E is parallel to the plane of incidence. I am also assuming that "glare" is caused by the E-field. But I'm not sure which reflection coeffient to use i.e do we assume that E is parallel to plane of incidence of perp.?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The E field from the blue sky is predominantly horizontally polarized.
This is because the Rayleigh scattering polarizes the scattered radiation.
The horizontal polarization comes out to be
P=sin^2\theta/(1+cos\theta)^2.
You will have to use both E polarizations at the water surface.
The above factor gives the polarized horizontal E^2. Then you have to include both E polarizations with E^2 = one half of the unpolarized component.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top