How can Pete solve a logarithmic problem using the Change of Base Formula?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Helicobacter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithmic
AI Thread Summary
To solve the logarithmic problem using the Change of Base Formula, Pete can start by recognizing that x^(log base x of y) simplifies directly to y. This follows from the definition of logarithms, where log_x(y) indicates the exponent to which x must be raised to yield y. By applying the property that x raised to the logarithm base x of y equals y, Pete can confidently conclude that x^(log_x(y)) = y. Understanding this relationship eliminates confusion about the cancel-out rule in logarithmic expressions. Thus, Pete can effectively solve the problem using his knowledge of logarithmic definitions and properties.
Helicobacter
Messages
158
Reaction score
0
Pete has access to a scientific calculator and only knows the Definition of a Logarithm and the Change of Base Formula. How is Pete able to solve the following problem?:

x^(log base x of y) =
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What is the definition of a logarithm ?
 
log base b of n = x <=> b^x = n
 
Let
\xi = \log_x y
\Leftrightarrow x ^ {\xi} = y, right?
So:
x ^ {\log_x y} = x ^ {\xi} = ?
Can you go from here? :)
 
Thanks! (Previously I knew the cancel-out-rule, but I didn't understand why you can cancel.)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
13K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
4K
Back
Top