What does C^r mean for a function of several variables?

AI Thread Summary
C^r for functions of several variables indicates that all partial derivatives, both mixed and unmixed, of order r must be continuous. This contrasts with the definition for functions of one variable, which focuses solely on the continuity of the rth derivative. The discussion confirms that the definition holds true across multiple variables. Understanding this distinction is crucial for analyzing the smoothness of multivariable functions. Overall, C^r signifies a higher level of continuity for derivatives in multivariable calculus.
quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
Wiki and mathworld only talk about C^r for functions of one variables, saying C^r is the space of function with and rth derivative that is continuous. But for a function of several variables to be C^r means that all its partial derivatives (mixed and not mixed) of order r are continuous, correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes. Tht is correct.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top