Fourier transform of a wave function

Kit
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
please refer to the attachment.

what is the physical meaning of g(k)?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
G(k) is the amplitude to find the particle with a wave number k (and hence momentum hk).
 


The Fourier transform of a wave function is a mathematical operation that decomposes a function into its constituent frequencies. In other words, it converts a function from the time or spatial domain to the frequency domain. This is useful in many areas of physics, such as signal processing, quantum mechanics, and spectroscopy.

In the attached image, g(k) represents the amplitude of the wave function in the frequency domain, where k is the wave vector. The physical meaning of g(k) is the contribution of each frequency component to the overall wave function. This can provide insights into the behavior and properties of the system, as different frequencies may correspond to different physical phenomena.

For example, in quantum mechanics, the Fourier transform of the wave function can reveal the energy levels of a system, as the energy of a particle is related to its frequency. In spectroscopy, the Fourier transform is used to analyze the frequencies of light emitted or absorbed by a substance, providing information about its chemical composition and structure.

Overall, the physical meaning of g(k) is that it represents the distribution of frequencies within the wave function, which can provide valuable information about the system being studied.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Back
Top