Solving Gravitational Forces on a Circular Disk with String Attached

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the dynamics of a circular disk with a string and a bob attached, analyzing the forces acting on the system. The equations of motion for both the bob and the disk's rotation are established, but there are concerns about the accuracy of the derived string force, particularly when friction exceeds a certain threshold. Participants suggest recalibrating the equations to account for the direction of friction, which prevents slipping, and emphasize the importance of considering translational motion for a complete analysis. Additionally, an alternative approach using torque around the point of contact is proposed, although it complicates the calculation of friction necessary for the second question. The conversation highlights the intricacies of applying Newtonian mechanics to this problem.
P3X-018
Messages
144
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(See the attachment)
A thin string has been wound around a homogeneuos circular disk A in such a way that the disk can roll on a horizontal surface. The mass of the disk is M, and has radius R. The string goes around a small frictionless pulley C at a height 2R above te horizental table B. To the free end of the string a bob of mass M is attached.
It is further assumed that the coefficient of friction \mu is so large that the disk rolls without slipping on the horizontal table.

1. Determine the magnitude of the force S, with which the string acts on the disk as long as the system moves under the influence of gravity.
2. Determine the smallest value of \mu that permits the disk to roll without slipping.

The Attempt at a Solution



The way I tried solving the first problem, is to first write down the equation of motion of the bob, as

M\ddot{y} = Mg-S

And the equation of motion for rotation

I_{CM}\ddot{\theta} = RS + Rf

where f is the force of friction on the disk providing a torque in the same direction as the strong force S.
Since the string is considered taut throughout the motion we can use the relation between the acceleration and angular acceleration, \ddot{y} = R\ddot{\theta}. When I solve for the string force, by using that I_{CM} = MR^2/2 I get

S = \frac{1}{3}(Mg - 2f)

But this result looks wrong, because the string force would be negative if the friction force is f > Mg/2.
Shouldn't a "negative" string force appear when if the frictional force was smaller than some given value, which would imply that disk would slip?

So the equations of motion must be wrong. Any hint to what I do wrong?
 

Attachments

  • im01.png
    im01.png
    1.5 KB · Views: 476
Physics news on Phys.org
Btw, how would the equations of motion be if I had to calculate the equation of motion for the rotation around the point of contact with the surface B? The frictional force wouldn't even be in the equations would it? Because there is a hint saying that you can try calculating the torque around the point/axis of contact.
 
P3X-018 said:
The way I tried solving the first problem, is to first write down the equation of motion of the bob, as

M\ddot{y} = Mg-S
Good.
And the equation of motion for rotation

I_{CM}\ddot{\theta} = RS + Rf

where f is the force of friction on the disk providing a torque in the same direction as the strong force S.
Which direction does friction point? Remember that friction acts to prevent slipping.

Once you correct that error you'll have the equation for rotation about the center of mass. But what about the translational motion of the disk? That will give you the third equation that you need.


P3X-018 said:
Btw, how would the equations of motion be if I had to calculate the equation of motion for the rotation around the point of contact with the surface B? The frictional force wouldn't even be in the equations would it? Because there is a hint saying that you can try calculating the torque around the point/axis of contact.
Using that approach (which is perfectly OK) effectively combines two of the three equations needed in your intial approach. Of course, that won't help with question 2, since you need to know the friction to answer that one. :wink:
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top